On Fri, Mar 12, 2010 at 10:44 PM, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler(a)chello.at> wrote:
Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
> Here is where we have a definition problem. To me, unbaked stuff is
> things that haven't had a good month of testing if its a large change
> (a couple of days if its a small one).
If you count all the testing done on prereleases, KDE 4.4.0 actually had
much MORE than a month of testing before being pushed. Even if you count
only the stable release, it got more than 2 weeks of total testing before
the stable push. But the changes between the RCs and the final were fairly
small.
So please don't overgeneralize claiming all the feature updates which are
getting pushed are "unbaked".
Kevin, I am only going to respond once because it is clear you don't
really read, you just shoot from your hip and you have not a single
iota of compromise.
You just inferred a whole lot into my post. I never said anything
about KDE in this post. I don't use it enough to be able to talk about
it. I gave a definition of what I thought unbaked was... nothing more,
nothing less.
I am done trying to have a conversation here... *plunk*
--
Stephen J Smoogen.
Ah, but a man's reach should exceed his grasp. Or what's a heaven for?
-- Robert Browning