On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 8:26 PM, Josh Boyer <jwboyer(a)gmail.com> wrote:
On Mon, Mar 19, 2012 at 3:46 PM, Jon Ciesla
<limburgher(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> * #830 F18 Feature: ARM as Primary Arch --
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Features/FedoraARM (limburgher,
> 18:44:13)
> * LINK:
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Test_Machine_Resources_For_Package_Maintainers
> (nirik, 18:45:42)
> * AGREED: ask qa, rel-eng, kernel and infra teams to provide feedback
> on the proposal. Ask fesco members to come up with critera that they
> would want to add and revisit next week. (+8,-:0,0:0) (limburgher,
> 19:09:50)
It's fairly disappointing this was discussed during this meeting without
being on the agenda that was sent out. This is a rather large item that
needs a lot of discussion among the various groups in Fedora, and I'm sure
that I'm not the only person that wasn't aware it was even going to be in
the meeting today. (Even ignoring the fact that the agenda was sent without
a proper Subject and easily skipped.)
It's plain irritating that per the logs, the proposers of this thought it
was just going to be covered in the 'Open Floor' section. Seriously, this
is not the way to start off on a great foot for such a major proposal.
Agreed, my apologies. I'm still getting the hang of chairing meetings
and only saw the ARM feature after I sent the agenda. I added it to
the meeting thinking additional discussion would be helpful, not
necessarily that it needed a definitive vote. I'll certainly be more
careful all around next time.
-J
josh
--
devel mailing list
devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
--
in your fear, seek only peace
in your fear, seek only love
-d. bowie