On Wed, 24 Nov 2010 11:03:41 +0100, Ralf wrote:
On 11/24/2010 10:45 AM, Matej Cepl wrote:
> Dne 24.11.2010 03:28, Ralf Corsepius napsal(a):
>> No, it's not your fault (Or at least only partially). A functional QA
>> would catch such kind of breakages.
>
> Yes, but functional QA would require more manpower than Fedora QA
> currently has.
That's one perspective.
Another one is: The approach having been taken is
non-feasible/impractiable/unsuiteable.
True. The appropriate action now would be to move the openldap package
onto a special QA list, which restricts the update acceptance criteria
further, so the openldap-servers must be tested, too. Especially if
the updates trigger database maintenance jobs.