Am 27.01.2014 01:32, schrieb Chris Murphy:
On Jan 26, 2014, at 5:20 PM, Reindl Harald
<h.reindl(a)thelounge.net> wrote:
> Am 27.01.2014 01:18, schrieb Chris Murphy:
>> You gave several examples of rollback-snapshot methods - same thing as you
suggested them. I never said you requested them
>
> oh my god - i gave several examples *what could be dangerous* in doing that
> i *never* ever suggested them
> please re-read the thread and then come back with an excuse
"suggested them" can mean two things in English: you recommend them, or they
are examples. I mean the 2nd case. I understand that you were not ever recommending your
examples. You were suggesting them as examples why snapshots in general are bad.
The problem is that your examples are crap. They're bad examples because they would
break the system, therefore no one would actually do snapshots-rollbacks per your
examples, unless they wanted to blow up their system.
boah the fact "therefore no one would actually do snapshots-rollbacks per your
examples" needs to be proven
i only just warned about cases where a rollback would do harm and to *make sure* that
really no one would
do it without take care
so where is now the point you started a flamewar against me instead
be quite or say "ok, that would be bad and hopefully does not happen"
this is a *dvelopent dicussion* and the goal of it is to *prevent*
mistakes ever happen *before* they are implemented or widely used