Dne 01. 04. 20 v 15:34 Neal Gompa napsal(a):
On Wed, Apr 1, 2020 at 9:26 AM Vít Ondruch
<vondruch(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Dne 01. 04. 20 v 14:33 Alex Scheel napsal(a):
>> ----- Original Message -----
>>> From: "Panu Matilainen" <pmatilai(a)redhat.com>
>>> To: devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>>> Sent: Wednesday, April 1, 2020 6:22:39 AM
>>> Subject: Re: CPE Git Forge Decision
>>>
>>>> I also appreciate that as a community developing our own solutions is
>>>> something important and something that seems to matter a lot, but we
>>>> have to realize that the development and maintenance effort cannot be
>>>> carried out by the CPE team any more. Maybe this is a opportunity to
>>>> create a SIG or a working group for people that are interested to carry
>>>> on this effort.
>>> But this is precisely at the heart of the problem: people feel they were
>>> not given an opportunity to lend a hand, and that now its too late
>>> because the messaging is that we go with GitLab, no matter what.
>> Pagure has huge developer experience bugs filed against it for many
>> years. Where have all these contributors been? Are those of us who really
>> dislike Pagure's workflows in the minority?
>
> Since you are asking, for dist-git and for ticket tracking in Fedora,
> Pagure is much better than what we ever had and with one exception (I am
> missing easy access to history of a file), there is not missing anything
> substantial.
>
We're getting this on the next Pagure upgrade:
https://stg.pagure.io/rpm-packages/pagure/history/pagure.spec
Cool, so then I won't miss any substantial feature for dist-git ;) Thank
you!
Vít