On Thu, 2020-04-02 at 16:48 -0700, Erich Eickmeyer wrote:
The root of this leadership failure seems to be that the discussion happened
mostly behind closed doors without any announcement *to this list* that this
was being discussed. Transparency is *key* in leadership.
Correction here: the decision process *was* actually initiated quite
publicly. It was announced in January, in a thread titled "Git Forge
Requirements: Please see the Community Blog", which (as you'd guess)
linked to a Community Blog post announcing that a decision was to be
made under the Open Decision Framework:
https://communityblog.fedoraproject.org/git-forge-requirements/
thus far, I'd say that was an example of good process, on the face of
it. It can be argued that things went wrong later. Earlier posts in
this thread have more details on that.
--
Adam Williamson
Fedora QA Community Monkey
IRC: adamw | Twitter: AdamW_Fedora | XMPP: adamw AT happyassassin . net
http://www.happyassassin.net