Dne 24. 11. 22 v 12:13 Michael J Gruber napsal(a):
I guess there's (at least) two ways to understand
"stable":
- things don't break
- things don't change
(... unless absolutely necessary, in each case)
To me, "things don't break" describes Fedora stable releases (as opposed to
rawhide), and "things don't change" describes RHEL.
A typical Fedora user wants the latest if it works and should be prepared to adjust to
the changes this brings with it
I disagree here. And even if you are right at this point, then they
could wait 6 months for next Fedora release, can't they?
Vít
(but not to rawhide-type breakage). A typical RHEL user wants a
stable environment for reproducible computing (short of containerizing and freezing for
reproducibility).
On a side-note: This is why Fedora packagers are sometimes hesitant to build for EPEL
because it means going by a different notion of "stable".
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue