On Tue, Jan 08, 2008 at 05:15:57PM -0500, Bill Nottingham wrote:
John Poelstra (poelstra(a)redhat.com) said:
> Most seemed to be in agreement that going forward, at the GA of each new
> release, the version of all existing rawhide bugs would be mass changed to
> the GA version. For example, for the upcoming release, open rawhide bugs
> at the time of GA we would changed to Fedora 9. This would have a few
> benefits as we go forward for each release:
> 1) encourage the closing of rawhide bugs that qualify
> 2) anchor the remaining rawhide bugs to the closest GA release so there
> is a marker in the future as to when they were reported.
Hm, this runs afoul of things like hosted projects that use Fedora bugzilla
as essentially an upstream bug tracker.
Shouldn't they be using a 'Fedora hosted' product, rather than the
main 'Fedora' product (albeit with possibly the same 'component' value)
Dan.
--
|=- Red Hat, Engineering, Emerging Technologies, Boston. +1 978 392 2496 -=|
|=- Perl modules:
http://search.cpan.org/~danberr/ -=|
|=- Projects:
http://freshmeat.net/~danielpb/ -=|
|=- GnuPG: 7D3B9505 F3C9 553F A1DA 4AC2 5648 23C1 B3DF F742 7D3B 9505 -=|