Dne 24.9.2018 v 17:17 Kevin Fenzi napsal(a):
On 09/24/2018 03:24 AM, M A Young wrote:
> On Mon, 24 Sep 2018, Petr Šabata wrote:
>
>>
>> Definitely an error.
>>
>> Could be another case of
>>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1629396, but it
>> should have been fixed last week. Is your repo current?
>> Could you check for the presence of modular repodata (the
>> *modules.yaml.gz) file.
>
> the dnf upgrade problem looks to me like
>
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1616118
It's actually fallout from
https://pagure.io/releng/issue/7827
Basically we are building flatpaks from modules, but then the modules
are getting into the normal module stream. They shouldn't and we need to
setup some different tagging for them to avoid it.
I do not believe this is the case. I do not have installed bubblewrap from module. I have
bubblewrap from F29. The
problem is that
bubblewrap-0.3.0-2.module_2123+73a9ef6f.x86_64 > bubblewrap-0.3.0-2.fc29.x86_64
And DNF put the module version into sack, despite the fact that I have all modules
disabled.
I thin that BZ 1616118 correctly describe it.
Miroslav