On Tue, 2004-01-06 at 13:23, seth vidal wrote:
On Tue, 2004-01-06 at 15:04, Chris Ricker wrote:
> On Tue, 6 Jan 2004, seth vidal wrote:
>
> > No one is saying you can't do this! The only thing I've been saying is
> > that Antivirus for OTHER OPERATING SYSTEMS does NOT belong in Core. It
> > should be in extras, certainly but not in core.
>
> That doesn't really follow, though. There are many applications in Core
> which are there because they facilitate integration of Fedora into
> environments with legacy OSes -- rdesktop, samba, etc. AV's just another one
> such app.
>
rdesktop you can use with vnc on ANY platform. Samba has been in there
for a long time. AV depends on access to commercial virus definitions
iirc. I'd say that's a good reason not to include it.
The clamav peopel do their own definitions. I think you are using too
old experiences/biases for your side of the argument. I think that if
you spent a week or so studying it.. you could come up with much better
arguments.
And hell, there are N web browsers in FC1 does that mean we should
add N
more?
No.
Hmmm... just because samba and other windows tools have been there for X
years in the distro.. should they remain there? I actually consider this
a legit question.
--
Stephen John Smoogen smoogen(a)lanl.gov
Los Alamos National Lab CCN-5 Sched 5/40 PH: 4-0645
Ta-03 SM-1498 MailStop B255 DP 10S Los Alamos, NM 87545
-- So shines a good deed in a weary world. = Willy Wonka --