Ville Skyttä wrote:
On Friday 15 February 2008, Arthur Pemberton wrote:
> Not to bicker of the potential naming, but how about just calling it
> git-meta so there is no ambiguity.
I think there's plenty of ambiguity in "git-meta". If the intent is to
install all git-* with this, call it "git-all", "git-everything" or
just drop
the whole metapackage and set up a git comps group.
+1