Re: /usrmove? (missing responsibility)

[Johannes Lips]

You couldn't force voluntary contributors to anything as you could for
example not be forced to contribute to the fedora project as well. So how
should this work?


On Fri, Feb 10, 2012 at 1:01 PM, Reindl Harald <h.reindl(a)thelounge.net&gt;wrote:

>  Am 10.02.2012 13:07, schrieb Josh Boyer:
>  > That is the definition of a product.  Fedora has never been a product.
>  > Fedora is a community driven distribution and as such has no central
>  > or overriding authority to tell people that volunteer their time to go do
>  > some specific thing they don't feel like doing.
>
>  and that is the root cause
>  nothing in life works without clear rules
>
>  if a distribution starts soemthing like systemd-transition or /usrmove
>  it needs clearly resposnibility and at least authority to make
>  sure that needed work is done or if a big amount of maintainers
>  does not needed changes to say "stop in this case we can not enforce
>  the change at all as long we have no way to make it lcean"
>
>  for me the switch from a redhat-controlled distribution to
>  a complelty community-one does not work, in times before this
>  change there was a party responsible for the coresystem
>
>  these days everybody and no one is responsible for anything
>  and "hope the needed work is done somehow from someone" will
>  not work forever
>
>
>
>
>
>  --
>  devel mailing list
>  devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>  https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel
>