Re: building against epel8 modules

[Nico Kadel-Garcia]

On Thu, Jul 1, 2021 at 11:24 PM Nico Kadel-Garcia <nkadel(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote:
>  On Thu, Jul 1, 2021 at 9:20 PM Josh Boyer <jwboyer(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; wrote:
>  >
>  >
>  >
>  > On Wed, Jun 23, 2021, 4:58 AM Nico Kadel-Garcia <nkadel(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote:
>  >>
>  >> On Tue, Jun 22, 2021 at 1:25 PM Jiri Vanek <jvanek(a)redhat.com&gt; wrote:
>  >> >
>  >> >
>  >> >
>  >> > On 6/22/21 7:08 PM, Stephen John Smoogen wrote:
>  >>
>  >> > > Welcome to RHEL-8 modularity and the joy it brings anyone trying to
>  >> > > port software to 8. The problem is not with EPEL but with the way
>  >> >
>  >> > hmm.  Thanx a lot of for a bt of light in darknes.. or mayb emore darkness
> in twilight :-)
>  >>
>  >> I can't find *anyone* who likes modularity. I'm devoutly hoping that
>  >> it is discarded for RHEL 9.
>  >
>  >
>  > For the record, it is not being discarded in RHEL 9.
>  >
>  > josh
>
>  Any chance of ignoring it almost entirely, or only using it for
>  modular packages? It caused real dependency for some perl modules, and
>  even the name is confusing when we start talking about perl and python
>  modules. 
Sorry, I meant "only use it for entirely optional, non-build-related software".