On Fri, Jul 14, 2017 at 09:44:18AM +0100, Richard W.M. Jones wrote:
On Mon, Jul 10, 2017 at 03:31:30PM -0400, Owen Taylor wrote:
> F29: packagers (of graphical applications) must create Flatpaks of
> their applications if possible. They *may* keep standard RPM
At least we see where this is going.
If RPMs of the graphical application work fine now, what on earth is
the point of forcing packagers to make Flatpaks? Sandboxing isn't one
of them - as already explained, sandboxing is orthogonal to packaging.
Huh? How would you get sandboxing without Flatpaks? Unless you are
proposing a different sandboxing technology.