On Mon, Nov 05, 2012 at 07:55:26PM +0100, Miloslav Trmač wrote:
> Here, I think you're smooshing together two of the three
levels I'd
> suggested, putting both non-crit-path enhancements and new leaf
> functionality into one category. Is that correct?
Yes, the "self-contained" wording covers both leaf features and a
subset of non-leaf features. "Non-crit-path" and "all relevant
maintainer are involved" are different subsets of non-leaf features,
however.
From the point of view of evaluating impact, and for that matter for
the
release notes, I think it's good to have big-non-crit-path-enhancements and
leaf functionality categorized separately. Both of them would need to be
self contained in the sense you're suggesting.
In fact, for that matter, wouldn't crit path updates _also_ benefit from the
"all relevant maintainers" rule?
--
Matthew Miller ☁☁☁ Fedora Cloud Architect ☁☁☁ <mattdm(a)fedoraproject.org>