Ben,
Can Fedora first-party flatpaks be built from unsigned, untrusted
content outside of the Fedora Repos? Or can they only be built from
content otherwise already present in Fedora? Just curious what
benefits a first-party flatpak has versus an upstream one.
AFAIK, the last Fedora Container docs said that all Container content
must be pulled from Fedora Repos, and therefore was left holding a
bunch of RPMs anyways.
- A
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 11:38 AM Ben Cotton <bcotton(a)redhat.com> wrote:
On Thu, Sep 10, 2020 at 10:54 AM Vitaly Zaitsev via devel
<devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org> wrote:
>
> On 10.09.2020 16:10, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
> > Flatpak is way better suited for our use case and in addition gives us
> > access to a way bigger install base.
>
> Flathub is a third-party repository and not related to Fedora at all.
>
Flat*hub* is third party, but we have first-party flatpaks at
registry.fedoraproject.org. The flatpak package adds it as a remote
via /usr/lib/systemd/system/flatpak-add-fedora-repos.service
--
Ben Cotton
He / Him / His
Senior Program Manager, Fedora & CentOS Stream
Red Hat
TZ=America/Indiana/Indianapolis
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org