On Tue, Feb 17, 2015 at 07:19:35AM -0500, Josh Boyer wrote:
On Feb 17, 2015 7:10 AM, "Peter Robinson"
<pbrobinson(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > Indeed, reproducing the failures only to get a /tmp/ccXXXXXX.out file
> > is not exactly fun.
> >
> > In a related vein, I think ABRT should bundle the /tmp/ccXXXXXX.out
> > files to its reports as well. From time to time we get reports as
> > <
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1189122>, but such a bug
> > report is largely useless without preprocessed source + command-line
> > options.
> >
> > Sorry if I'm driving this off-topic.
>
> Yes, the way to do that is to file a RFE in RHBZ against abrt, they
> are very responsive!
Oh, we already have an RFE:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1139841
We should not include preprocessed source files by default without
the user
knowing and agreeing. People use gcc to build proprietary source still.
That is a good point; the users would have to agree with sending the
preprocessed file.
Marek