On Fri, Nov 11, 2022 at 07:17:00PM +0100, Miro Hrončok wrote:
On 11. 11. 22 17:24, Sandro wrote:
> I'm not quite sure why pulling in an additional supplemental dependency
> would be considered a breaking change. Is it because rpmlint behaves
> differently with the new license definitions?
Yes. Suppose I am running a Fedora 36 system with rpmlint installed and I
use it to validate spec files for RHEL 9. When I install
rpmlint-fedora-license-data, a huge bulk of licenses that were not valid
when I started to use Fedora 36 and that are not valid for RHEL 9 are
suddenly valid.
To clarify -- while SPDX license strings are not valid for RHEL 9, are
they valid for EPEL 9?
Thanks,
--
Michel Alexandre Salim
identities:
https://keyoxide.org/5dce2e7e9c3b1cffd335c1d78b229d2f7ccc04f2