----- Original Message -----
From: "Matthias Runge" <mrunge(a)matthias-runge.de>
To: "Development discussions related to Fedora"
<devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org>
Sent: Friday, March 2, 2012 2:34:11 PM
Subject: Re: Automating the NonResponsiveMaintainers policy
On 02/03/12 13:24, Aleksandar Kurtakov wrote:
> Well, the whole idea came in a second so someone should refine it.
> FWIW the period should be long enough - in my eyes not less than a
> months so if noone responded in like 3 months the fix would no
> longer
> be at least quick. And as always we trust people to do the right
> and
> have a good understanding of their capabilities and knowledge. No
> proposal/technology can prevent bad intentions.
Yes, I guess, many people have very different time frame in their
heads.
If we'd like to try this out, what would be the right way to propose
this change?
I really have no idea nor I would have the time to deal with such thing anytime soon as it
will also require development work if accepted. The current process works fine for me. I
just wanted to show that there are better way than throwing out people.
Alex
--
Matthias Runge <mrunge(a)matthias-runge.de>
<mrunge(a)fedoraproject.org>
--
devel mailing list
devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/devel