On Nov 14, 2009, at 13:53, Sam Varshavchik mrsam@courier-mta.com wrote:
Tom Lane writes:
Mike McGrath mmcgrath@redhat.com writes:
Are people +1'ing getting rid of the broken dependencies script altogether? or +1'ing to predicting the future and stopping it before it breaks?
I thought the +1's were for putting in some circuit breakers, so that when (not if) it breaks again, it won't spam the entire package
Proposed circuit breaker: if more than 5% of packages supposedly have broken dependencies.
Sounds reasonable. Accepting patches if you want this done in the new future.
-- Jes