Dne 18.7.2017 v 13:23 Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski napsal(a):
On Tuesday, 18 July 2017 at 00:02, Michael Catanzaro wrote:
> On Mon, Jul 17, 2017 at 3:38 AM, Kevin Kofler <kevin.kofler(a)chello.at>
>> The problem is that the RPMs that go into the Flatpaks are not FHS-
>> compliant, so the RPMs will have to carry some conditionals and be built
> Yes, that is true. Some apps will have to be patched for Flatpak, and
> building them as both RPMs and Flatpaks is going to require conditionals. So
> there will be some overhead if we support both.
I think this is unacceptable and a blocker. It didn't work with SCLs and
it won't work with Flatpak, either. Flatpaks must be possible to build
from unmodified RPMs or as part of RPM build process.
It didn't work for SCLs? How comes?