On Tuesday, August 4, 2020 1:45:52 AM MST Vít Ondruch wrote:
Yesterday, I have updated my Rawhide and wondered why `dnf
would want to remove earlyoom just to discover that soft dependency in
earlyoom was dropped  and hence nothing requires earlyoom and DNF is
free to remove this package (and it is possibly not installed anymore on
Therefore I wonder what is the status of EarlyOOM. Should I let the
package go? If not, then the situation should be fixed somehow, probably
either by reverting the revert or adding the dependency into
fedora-release as was proposed elsewhere.
Generally, if you let the package go, your system won't suffer from your
processes getting killed needlessly. This is likely a benefit, so I don't know
if this is really a bug.
John M. Harris, Jr.