On Thu, 2022-12-01 at 13:21 +0800, yanqiyu(a)fedoraproject.org wrote:
Hi all,
It seems update fcitx5-qt-5.0.16-2.fc37 from [1] somehow did not make
it to stable repository while other package in same update did. This
caused broken dependences during update [2].
Seems that bodhi is doing something weird. I might have an idea how
this happened.]: I decided to update fcitx5-qt to 5.0.16 and created
a
update [3] containing fcitx5-qt-5.0.16-1.fc37, during [3] waiting to
make it to stable, qt6 rebuild happens and created another update
with
fcitx5-qt-5.0.16-2.fc37 [1]. [1] gets a lot karma and pushed to
stable
soon. And when [3] gets pushed afterwards, somehow fcitx5-qt-5.0.16-
1.fc37 overrides fcitx5-qt-5.0.16-2.fc37.
IMO , when fcitx5-qt-5.0.16-2.fc37 went to bodhi should have obsoleted
fcitx5-qt-5.0.16-1.fc37 .
But if fcitx5-qt-5.0.16-1.fc37 was already marked got to stable , was
not obsoleted , and a race condition might happened .
In resume I think is a bug
I don't know if this behavior should be considered as a bug, but
anyway, it seems that manual override from releng is needed to fix
the
broken dependencies.
Cheers,
Qiyu Yan
[1]:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-9821716191
[2]:
https://github.com/fcitx/fcitx5/issues/678
[3]:
https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-729ae0f3ae
_______________________________________________
devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Fedora Code of Conduct:
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines:
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives:
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/devel@lists.fedoraproject.org
Do not reply to spam, report it:
https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
--
Sérgio M. B.