On Mon, Jan 09, 2023 at 11:53:17PM +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
Am Montag, 9. Jänner 2023 23:06:17 CET schrieb Zbigniew
Jędrzejewski-Szmek:
> On Sun, Jan 08, 2023 at 06:06:47PM +0100, Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> > Kevin Kofler via devel wrote:
> > PS: The impression I get is that everything was deliberately rigged
> > so that the vote would end up the way it did:
>
> You're mixing up two things: a vote being "rigged" with a result you
don't
> like.
No, the result is NOT why I got the impression that the vote was rigged. The
way that result was obtained is.
Exactly, you're just confirming what I wrote above.
A "vote being rigged" means that either the people who should be allowed to
vote
couldn't, or that people who are not allowed to vote did, or that voters were
tricked or forced to vote differently, or that votes were miscounted.
None of this happened in this case. The fact that the absolute majority of FESCo
cast a vote makes the considerations simpler, because we know that the two votes
that were not cast would not have changed the result.
In fact, I had explained exactly that in
the remainder of the message, which you omitted from your quote and pushed
to the bottom of the mail (and even that quotes only half of it) for some
reason.
You message very verbosely explains why you think the result should be different.
That is not "rigged". That is other people deciding differently than you.
Zbyszek