Non responsive maintainer check for marxin

[Ankur Sinha]

Hi folks,

Would anyone know how to contact @marxin? They only maintain the one
package, python-pebble, but it doesn't look like they've been active in
a while. The package did not see to have been updated at all since the
initial import:

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2227456

and there are now new pending bugs that have not seen responses too:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250914

We've waited for responses to PRs in the past and then had to use proven
packager rights to update and maintain the package:

https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-pebble/pull-request/2
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-pebble/commits/rawhide

Since a Neuro-SIG package depends on it, we're happy to take it over.

Here's what I could get from fedora-active-user:

python fedora_active_user.py --user marxin --email mliska(a)suse.cz
--nofas
Last action on koji:
   Fri, 15 Sep 2023 tag_package_owners entry created by humaton [still
   active]

   Last package update on bodhi:
      2020-06-29 07:10:30 on package python-pebble-4.5.3-1.fc33
      Last actions performed according to fedmsg:

      Last email on mailing list:
      ERROR:active-user:name 'mailinglist' is not defined


Here's the tracker bug:
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2256491

-- 
Thanks,
Regards,
Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) |
https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
Time zone: Europe/London

[Priscila Gutierres]

Does any package depend on python-pebble?
I could not find anything running repoquery  --whatrequires python-pebble

On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 2:56 PM Ankur Sinha <sanjay.ankur(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote:

>  Hi folks,
>
>  Would anyone know how to contact @marxin? They only maintain the one
>  package, python-pebble, but it doesn't look like they've been active in
>  a while. The package did not see to have been updated at all since the
>  initial import:
>
>  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2227456
>
>  and there are now new pending bugs that have not seen responses too:
>  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2250914
>
>  We've waited for responses to PRs in the past and then had to use proven
>  packager rights to update and maintain the package:
>
>  https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-pebble/pull-request/2
>  https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-pebble/commits/rawhide
>
>  Since a Neuro-SIG package depends on it, we're happy to take it over.
>
>  Here's what I could get from fedora-active-user:
>
>  python fedora_active_user.py --user marxin --email mliska(a)suse.cz
>  --nofas
>  Last action on koji:
>     Fri, 15 Sep 2023 tag_package_owners entry created by humaton [still
>     active]
>
>     Last package update on bodhi:
>        2020-06-29 07:10:30 on package python-pebble-4.5.3-1.fc33
>        Last actions performed according to fedmsg:
>
>        Last email on mailing list:
>        ERROR:active-user:name 'mailinglist' is not defined
>
>
>  Here's the tracker bug:
>  https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2256491
>
>  --
>  Thanks,
>  Regards,
>  Ankur Sinha "FranciscoD" (He / Him / His) |
>  https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/User:Ankursinha
>  Time zone: Europe/London
>  --
>  _______________________________________________
>  devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>  To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>  Fedora Code of Conduct:
>  https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
>  List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>  List Archives:
>  https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[e-mail]
>  Do not reply to spam, report it:
>  https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>

[Sandro]

On 02-01-2024 20:28, Priscila Gutierres wrote:
>  Does any package depend on python-pebble?
>  I could not find anything running repoquery  --whatrequires python-pebble 
You need to query for `python3-pebble`.

$ dnf repoquery --whatrequires python3-pebble
Last metadata expiration check: 0:04:03 ago on Tue 02 Jan 2024 20:57:02.
cvise-0:2.8.0-1.fc39.x86_64
python3-bluepyopt-0:1.14.3-1.fc39.x86_64
python3-bluepyopt-0:1.14.6-5.fc39.x86_64

I use `fedrq` these days.

$ fedrq wr -s python3-pebble
cvise-2.9.0-1.fc40.src
python-bluepyopt-1.14.6-5.fc40.src

-- Sandro

[Priscila Gutierres]

Thank you !

Em ter., 2 de jan. de 2024 às 17:05, Sandro <lists(a)penguinpee.nl&gt; escreveu:

>  On 02-01-2024 20:28, Priscila Gutierres wrote:
>  > Does any package depend on python-pebble?
>  > I could not find anything running repoquery  --whatrequires python-pebble
>
>  You need to query for `python3-pebble`.
>
>  $ dnf repoquery --whatrequires python3-pebble
>  Last metadata expiration check: 0:04:03 ago on Tue 02 Jan 2024 20:57:02.
>  cvise-0:2.8.0-1.fc39.x86_64
>  python3-bluepyopt-0:1.14.3-1.fc39.x86_64
>  python3-bluepyopt-0:1.14.6-5.fc39.x86_64
>
>  I use `fedrq` these days.
>
>  $ fedrq wr -s python3-pebble
>  cvise-2.9.0-1.fc40.src
>  python-bluepyopt-1.14.6-5.fc40.src
>
>  -- Sandro
>
>  --
>  _______________________________________________
>  devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>  To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>  Fedora Code of Conduct:
>  https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
>  List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>  List Archives:
>  https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[e-mail]
>  Do not reply to spam, report it:
>  https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>

[Priscila Gutierres]

I bumped python-pebble to the latest version.
Can someone please review this PR?
https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-pebble/pull-request/3


On Tue, Jan 2, 2024 at 5:05 PM Sandro <lists(a)penguinpee.nl&gt; wrote:

>  On 02-01-2024 20:28, Priscila Gutierres wrote:
>  > Does any package depend on python-pebble?
>  > I could not find anything running repoquery  --whatrequires python-pebble
>
>  You need to query for `python3-pebble`.
>
>  $ dnf repoquery --whatrequires python3-pebble
>  Last metadata expiration check: 0:04:03 ago on Tue 02 Jan 2024 20:57:02.
>  cvise-0:2.8.0-1.fc39.x86_64
>  python3-bluepyopt-0:1.14.3-1.fc39.x86_64
>  python3-bluepyopt-0:1.14.6-5.fc39.x86_64
>
>  I use `fedrq` these days.
>
>  $ fedrq wr -s python3-pebble
>  cvise-2.9.0-1.fc40.src
>  python-bluepyopt-1.14.6-5.fc40.src
>
>  -- Sandro
>
>  --
>  _______________________________________________
>  devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>  To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>  Fedora Code of Conduct:
>  https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
>  List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>  List Archives:
>  https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[e-mail]
>  Do not reply to spam, report it:
>  https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>

[Sandro]

On 04-01-2024 23:05, Priscila Gutierres wrote:
>  I bumped python-pebble to the latest version.
>  Can someone please review this PR?
>  https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-pebble/pull-request/3 
Reviewing the PR is not a problem. However, who would merge it, once 
approved? That needs a proven packager in the current situation, since 
the sole maintainer is unresponsive.

No offense, but you are kinda hijacking this thread.

-- Sandro

[Priscila Gutierres]

I would like to apologize if it seems that I’m being rude asking for a
review in this thread.
My point of view is that if the package is a dependency and no one is
looking on it, it would be a priority to keep it up to date.
I don’t know if merging it would be possible, since the maintainer is not
responding, if not, I can close it.
Also, I noticed any maintainer can merge it.
I am a new maintainer and I don’t want to create polemics, I am here to
hear and learn, but if I don’t participate in the discussion is more hard
to learn. In any case, I apologize again if I was impolite.


Em qui., 4 de jan. de 2024 às 20:07, Sandro <lists(a)penguinpee.nl&gt; escreveu:

>  On 04-01-2024 23:05, Priscila Gutierres wrote:
>  > I bumped python-pebble to the latest version.
>  > Can someone please review this PR?
>  > https://src.fedoraproject.org/rpms/python-pebble/pull-request/3
>
>  Reviewing the PR is not a problem. However, who would merge it, once
>  approved? That needs a proven packager in the current situation, since
>  the sole maintainer is unresponsive.
>
>  No offense, but you are kinda hijacking this thread.
>
>  -- Sandro
>
>  --
>  _______________________________________________
>  devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>  To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>  Fedora Code of Conduct:
>  https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
>  List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>  List Archives:
>  https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[e-mail]
>  Do not reply to spam, report it:
>  https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>

[Sandro]

On 05-01-2024 01:50, Priscila Gutierres wrote:
>  I would like to apologize if it seems that I’m being rude asking for
> a
>  review in this thread. 
It's perfectly fine asking for a review. But that should go into its own 
mail to the list or, preferably, to <${package}-maintainers(a)fp.o&gt;.

Currently, this thread aims to solve the maintainer situation with 
regards to pebble. Once that's done, the package will be handed over to 
an active maintainer.

Since you appear to be interested in maintaining pebble, you might even 
get to be added as a maintainer once the current situation has been solved.

>  My point of view is that if the package is a dependency and no one
> is
>  looking on it, it would be a priority to keep it up to date. 
That depends...

>  I don’t know if merging it would be possible, since the maintainer is
> not
>  responding, if not, I can close it. 
Leave it open. A proven packager can still merge it or you may get to 
merge it yourself once the package has been handed over.

>  Also, I noticed any maintainer can merge it. 
Yes. Anyone with commit rights can merge. But currently there's only one 
person enlisted and only that person can add co-maintainers.

>  I am a new maintainer and I don’t want to create polemics, I am here
> to
>  hear and learn, but if I don’t participate in the discussion is more hard
>  to learn. In any case, I apologize again if I was impolite. 
It's all good. This thread is regarding the non-responsive maintainer 
check [1]. It shouldn't become a discussion thread. That's all I was/am 
concerned about.

[1] 
https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/fesco/Policy_for_nonresponsive_packa...