On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 4:12 PM, Neal Becker <ndbecker2(a)gmail.com> wrote:
Thomas Spura wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Neal Becker <ndbecker2(a)gmail.com> wrote:
>> acceptance of pep 394 should be of interest to python users
>
> Why?
> We already do that on fedora so nothing will change.
> (Right now we have a symlink from python2 -> python and not the other
> way around like in the pep, but the result for a user is the same.)
Thanks, I hadn't noticed we already have implemented python2 symlink.
Good :)
I just had the feeling you mean Fedora is a "bleeding edge disto" ;)
-Tom