Thomas Spura wrote:
On Fri, Feb 17, 2012 at 2:45 PM, Neal Becker
<ndbecker2(a)gmail.com> wrote:
> acceptance of pep 394 should be of interest to python users
Why?
We already do that on fedora so nothing will change.
(Right now we have a symlink from python2 -> python and not the other
way around like in the pep, but the result for a user is the same.)
Greetings,
Tom
Thanks, I hadn't noticed we already have implemented python2 symlink.