On 11/07/2017 03:23 PM, Richard Shaw wrote:
During a package review rpmlint noted that the package did not own
/usr/share/metainfo.
A cursory "rpm -q --whatprovides /usr/share/metainfo" returned no results.
I know rpm can handle multiple packages owning a directory these days
but I don't think it is correct for a package only providing an appdata
file to own /usr/share/metainfo...
So what package should?
It's already owned by filesystem, in F27+. Just list
/usr/share/metainfo/* in your package's %files and ignore the warnings
on older Fedoras.
--
Kalev