Heads-up: ODE soname bump

[Hedayat Vatankhah]

Hi all,

As part of building ODE 0.16, ode's soname has been bumped from 
libode.so.4/libode-double.so.4  to libode.so.8/libode-double.so.8.

This package is now built as part of Fedora 37 Mass Rebuild, so we 
expect all dependent packages to be automatically built again during 
this process.

We do not expect to see compilation failures because of this update.


Regards,

Hedayat

[Kalev Lember]

On Sun, Jul 24, 2022 at 4:41 PM Hedayat Vatankhah <hedayat.fwd(a)gmail.com&gt;
wrote:

>  Hi all,
>
>  As part of building ODE 0.16, ode's soname has been bumped from
>  libode.so.4/libode-double.so.4  to libode.so.8/libode-double.so.8.
>
>  This package is now built as part of Fedora 37 Mass Rebuild, so we expect
>  all dependent packages to be automatically built again during this process.
>
>  We do not expect to see compilation failures because of this update.
>  
Hi Hedayat,

No, this is not how mass rebuilds work. If ODE 0.16 was only built as part
of the mass rebuild and wasn't available in the buildroot during the mass
rebuild (and I don't think it was), then all the other packages that depend
on it were still built against the older ODE 0.14 version as part of the
mass rebuild. Once the mass rebuild is merged back into f37 then all other
packages that depend on ODE are going to have broken dependencies.

-- 
Kalev

[Maxwell G]

On 22/07/24 06:05PM, Kalev Lember wrote:
>  If ODE 0.16 was only built as part of the mass rebuild and
> wasn't
>  available in the buildroot during the mass rebuild (and I don't think
>  it was), then all the other packages that depend on it were still
>  built against the older ODE 0.14 version as part of the mass rebuild.
>  Once the mass rebuild is merged back into f37 then all other packages
>  that depend on ODE are going to have broken dependencies. 
That indeed appears to be the case. The f37-rebuild build target[1]
builds against f37-build but tags completed builds into f37-rebuild.
ode-0.16.2-2.fc37[2] is only tagged into f37-rebuild.

[1]: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildtargetinfo?targetID=24581
[2]: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2016899

Also, looking at ompl, one of ode's dependents, you can see that it was
rebuilt against the old version of ode:

>  DEBUG util.py:445:   ode-devel                              x86_64 
> 0.14-15.fc36               build   66 k 
--
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/ompl/1.5.0/11.fc37/data/logs...
and
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2016925https://koji...

In order to fix this, a provenpackager will need to build all of the
dependents in a sidetag like normal. Preferably, this could happen
before the mass rebuild tag is merged back into f37. I am a bit busy
today, but I suppose I could do this later if nobody beats me to it.

-- 
Thanks,

Maxwell G (@gotmax23)
Pronouns: He/Him/His

[Robert-André Mauchin]

On 7/24/22 16:40, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
>  Hi all,
>  
>  As part of building ODE 0.16, ode's soname has been bumped from 
>  libode.so.4/libode-double.so.4  to libode.so.8/libode-double.so.8.
>  
>  This package is now built as part of Fedora 37 Mass Rebuild, so we expect all dependent 
>  packages to be automatically built again during this process.
>  
>  We do not expect to see compilation failures because of this update.
>  
>  
>  Regards,
>  
>  Hedayat
>   
Use (Close: rhbz#1438205) instead of (rhbz#1438205)
or Closes: rhbz#1438205, Fix: rhbz#1438205, Fixes: rhbz#1438205
to automatically close the related nug

On 7/24/22 19:14, Maxwell G via devel wrote:
>  On 22/07/24 06:05PM, Kalev Lember wrote:
> > If ODE 0.16 was only built as part of the mass rebuild and wasn't
> > available in the buildroot during the mass rebuild (and I don't think
> > it was), then all the other packages that depend on it were still
> > built against the older ODE 0.14 version as part of the mass rebuild.
> > Once the mass rebuild is merged back into f37 then all other packages
> > that depend on ODE are going to have broken dependencies.
>
>  That indeed appears to be the case. The f37-rebuild build target[1]
>  builds against f37-build but tags completed builds into f37-rebuild.
>  ode-0.16.2-2.fc37[2] is only tagged into f37-rebuild.
>
>  [1]: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildtargetinfo?targetID=24581
>  [2]: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2016899
>
>  Also, looking at ompl, one of ode's dependents, you can see that it was
>  rebuilt against the old version of ode:
>
> > DEBUG util.py:445:   ode-devel                              x86_64  0.14-15.fc36 
        build   66 k
>  -- 
https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/ompl/1.5.0/11.fc37/data/logs...
and
>  
https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2016925https://koji...
>  In order to fix this, a provenpackager will need to build all of the
>  dependents in a sidetag like normal. Preferably, this could happen
>  before the mass rebuild tag is merged back into f37. I am a bit busy
>  today, but I suppose I could do this later if nobody beats me to it.
>  
It is done: https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-26df2fedba

Had to fixup freewrl though, the java thing on i686.

Best regards,

Robert-André

[Hedayat Vatankhah]

On ۱۴۰۱/۵/۳ ۴:۵۴ قبل‌ازظهر, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
>  On 7/24/22 16:40, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
> > <...>
>
>  Use (Close: rhbz#1438205) instead of (rhbz#1438205)
>  or Closes: rhbz#1438205, Fix: rhbz#1438205, Fixes: rhbz#1438205
>  to automatically close the related nug 
Thanks for the tip.


>  On 7/24/22 19:14, Maxwell G via devel wrote:
>  > On 22/07/24 06:05PM, Kalev Lember wrote:
>  >> If ODE 0.16 was only built as part of the mass rebuild and wasn't
>  >> available in the buildroot during the mass rebuild (and I don't think
>  >> it was), then all the other packages that depend on it were still
>  >> built against the older ODE 0.14 version as part of the mass rebuild.
>  >> Once the mass rebuild is merged back into f37 then all other packages
>  >> that depend on ODE are going to have broken dependencies.
>  >
>  > That indeed appears to be the case. The f37-rebuild build target[1]
>  > builds against f37-build but tags completed builds into f37-rebuild.
>  > ode-0.16.2-2.fc37[2] is only tagged into f37-rebuild.
>  >
>  > [1]: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildtargetinfo?targetID=24581
>  > [2]: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2016899
>  >
>  > Also, looking at ompl, one of ode's dependents, you can see that it was
>  > rebuilt against the old version of ode:
>  >
>  >> DEBUG util.py:445: ode-devel                              x86_64  
>  0.14-15.fc36 build   66 k
>  >
>  > -- 
>  https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/ompl/1.5.0/11.fc37/data/logs...
>
>  and
>  > 
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2016925https://koji...
>  >
>  > In order to fix this, a provenpackager will need to build all of the
>  > dependents in a sidetag like normal. Preferably, this could happen
>  > before the mass rebuild tag is merged back into f37. I am a bit busy
>  > today, but I suppose I could do this later if nobody beats me to it.
>  >
>
>  It is done: 
>  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-26df2fedba
>
>  Had to fixup freewrl though, the java thing on i686. 
Thanks a lot for fixing this. And sorry for the trouble.


Thanks,

Hedayat




>  Best regards,
>
>  Robert-André