Re: Heads-up: ODE soname bump

[Hedayat Vatankhah]

On ۱۴۰۱/۵/۳ ۴:۵۴ قبل‌ازظهر, Robert-André Mauchin wrote:
>  On 7/24/22 16:40, Hedayat Vatankhah wrote:
> > <...>
>
>  Use (Close: rhbz#1438205) instead of (rhbz#1438205)
>  or Closes: rhbz#1438205, Fix: rhbz#1438205, Fixes: rhbz#1438205
>  to automatically close the related nug 
Thanks for the tip.


>  On 7/24/22 19:14, Maxwell G via devel wrote:
>  > On 22/07/24 06:05PM, Kalev Lember wrote:
>  >> If ODE 0.16 was only built as part of the mass rebuild and wasn't
>  >> available in the buildroot during the mass rebuild (and I don't think
>  >> it was), then all the other packages that depend on it were still
>  >> built against the older ODE 0.14 version as part of the mass rebuild.
>  >> Once the mass rebuild is merged back into f37 then all other packages
>  >> that depend on ODE are going to have broken dependencies.
>  >
>  > That indeed appears to be the case. The f37-rebuild build target[1]
>  > builds against f37-build but tags completed builds into f37-rebuild.
>  > ode-0.16.2-2.fc37[2] is only tagged into f37-rebuild.
>  >
>  > [1]: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildtargetinfo?targetID=24581
>  > [2]: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2016899
>  >
>  > Also, looking at ompl, one of ode's dependents, you can see that it was
>  > rebuilt against the old version of ode:
>  >
>  >> DEBUG util.py:445: ode-devel                              x86_64  
>  0.14-15.fc36 build   66 k
>  >
>  > -- 
>  https://kojipkgs.fedoraproject.org//packages/ompl/1.5.0/11.fc37/data/logs...
>
>  and
>  > 
>
> https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=2016925https://koji...
>  >
>  > In order to fix this, a provenpackager will need to build all of the
>  > dependents in a sidetag like normal. Preferably, this could happen
>  > before the mass rebuild tag is merged back into f37. I am a bit busy
>  > today, but I suppose I could do this later if nobody beats me to it.
>  >
>
>  It is done: 
>  https://bodhi.fedoraproject.org/updates/FEDORA-2022-26df2fedba
>
>  Had to fixup freewrl though, the java thing on i686. 
Thanks a lot for fixing this. And sorry for the trouble.


Thanks,

Hedayat




>  Best regards,
>
>  Robert-André