Confused by packager dashboard: FTBFS (source)

[Richard Shaw]

I've really been enjoying using the dashboard, it's pointed out things that
I quite frankly forgot about.

For python-pyside2 though it's showing FTBFS at the source level due to
qt5-qtwebengine not being built for ppc64le and s390x, but I have a
%ifnarch conditional removing it from the build requirements for those
arches.

After convincing myself that it must be being pulled in from another
package I tried playing around with installing qtwebengine by starting a
build of pyside2 in a mock chroot and shelling into it, but I was able to
rpm -e it without conflicts with other installed packages.

I then tried a scratch build which largely succeeded, all arches built but
s390x failed during %check.

https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=92294488

So what gives?

Thanks,
Richard

[Iñaki Ucar]

I opened an issue in the dashboard repo for the same reason some weeks ago.
It turns out there's a limitation on detecting these cases, so Fabio
maintains a whitelist.

Iñaki

El sáb., 24 sept. 2022 4:19, Richard Shaw <hobbes1069(a)gmail.com&gt; escribió:

>  I've really been enjoying using the dashboard, it's pointed
> out things
>  that I quite frankly forgot about.
>
>  For python-pyside2 though it's showing FTBFS at the source level due to
>  qt5-qtwebengine not being built for ppc64le and s390x, but I have a
>  %ifnarch conditional removing it from the build requirements for those
>  arches.
>
>  After convincing myself that it must be being pulled in from another
>  package I tried playing around with installing qtwebengine by starting a
>  build of pyside2 in a mock chroot and shelling into it, but I was able to
>  rpm -e it without conflicts with other installed packages.
>
>  I then tried a scratch build which largely succeeded, all arches built but
>  s390x failed during %check.
>
>  https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=92294488
>
>  So what gives?
>
>  Thanks,
>  Richard
>  _______________________________________________
>  devel mailing list -- devel(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>  To unsubscribe send an email to devel-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>  Fedora Code of Conduct:
>  https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
>  List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
>  List Archives:
>  https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/[e-mail]
>  Do not reply to spam, report it:
>  https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure/new_issue
>

[Fabio Valentini]

Sat, Sep 24, 2022 at 8:39 AM Iñaki Ucar <iucar(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; wrote:
>  I opened an issue in the dashboard repo for the same reason some weeks ago. It turns out
> there's a limitation on detecting these cases, so Fabio maintains a whitelist. 
Yup :( This is due to the fact that architecture-specific
BuildRequires are not accurately represented in package repository
data.

TL;DR: koji builds the .src.rpm file for all architectures, but only
keeps a random one, which then ends up in the "-source" repositories
that is shared by all architectures.
If it happens to be from an architecture that *has* these
BuildRequires, then the package will have BuildRequires in its
metadata that are unresolvable on some architectures.

I can add python-pyside2 to the list, if you give me the exact error you see.
There are already a few packages that are filtered out because of
qt5-qtwebengine, so you're in good company:
https://pagure.io/ironthree/repochecker/blob/master/f/overrides.json#_106

Fabio

[Richard Shaw]

On Sat, Sep 24, 2022 at 4:58 AM Fabio Valentini <decathorpe(a)gmail.com&gt;
wrote:

>  Sat, Sep 24, 2022 at 8:39 AM Iñaki Ucar
> <iucar(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; wrote:
>  >
>  > I opened an issue in the dashboard repo for the same reason some weeks
>  ago. It turns out there's a limitation on detecting these cases, so Fabio
>  maintains a whitelist.
>
>  I can add python-pyside2 to the list, if you give me the exact error you
>  see.
>  There are already a few packages that are filtered out because of
>  qt5-qtwebengine, so you're in good company:
>  https://pagure.io/ironthree/repochecker/blob/master/f/overrides.json#_106 

The exact BR is:
cmake(Qt5WebEngine) >= 5.14

Thanks,
Richard

[Fabio Valentini]

On Sat, Sep 24, 2022 at 1:55 PM Richard Shaw <hobbes1069(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote:
>  On Sat, Sep 24, 2022 at 4:58 AM Fabio Valentini <decathorpe(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote:
> >
> > Sat, Sep 24, 2022 at 8:39 AM Iñaki Ucar <iucar(a)fedoraproject.org&gt; wrote:
> > >
> > > I opened an issue in the dashboard repo for the same reason some weeks ago. It
> turns out there's a limitation on detecting these cases, so Fabio maintains a
> whitelist.
> >
> > I can add python-pyside2 to the list, if you give me the exact error you see.
> > There are already a few packages that are filtered out because of
> > qt5-qtwebengine, so you're in good company:
> > https://pagure.io/ironthree/repochecker/blob/master/f/overrides.json#_106
>
>
>  The exact BR is:
>  cmake(Qt5WebEngine) >= 5.14 
Sorry for taking so long to get back to this. I only just managed to
get my overflowing email inbox under control ...
Either way, the python-pyside2 issue should be resolved now, and it
appears the updated data has already propagated to the packager
dashboard.

Fabio

[Richard Shaw]

On Mon, Oct 17, 2022 at 2:53 PM Fabio Valentini <decathorpe(a)gmail.com&gt;
wrote:

>  On Sat, Sep 24, 2022 at 1:55 PM Richard Shaw
> <hobbes1069(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote:
>  >
>  > On Sat, Sep 24, 2022 at 4:58 AM Fabio Valentini <decathorpe(a)gmail.com&gt;
>  wrote:
>  >>
>  >> Sat, Sep 24, 2022 at 8:39 AM Iñaki Ucar <iucar(a)fedoraproject.org&gt;
>  wrote:
>  >> >
>  >> > I opened an issue in the dashboard repo for the same reason some
>  weeks ago. It turns out there's a limitation on detecting these cases, so
>  Fabio maintains a whitelist.
>  >>
>  >> I can add python-pyside2 to the list, if you give me the exact error
>  you see.
>  >> There are already a few packages that are filtered out because of
>  >> qt5-qtwebengine, so you're in good company:
>  >>
>  https://pagure.io/ironthree/repochecker/blob/master/f/overrides.json#_106
>  >
>  >
>  > The exact BR is:
>  > cmake(Qt5WebEngine) >= 5.14
>
>  Sorry for taking so long to get back to this. I only just managed to
>  get my overflowing email inbox under control ...
>  Either way, the python-pyside2 issue should be resolved now, and it
>  appears the updated data has already propagated to the packager
>  dashboard.
>  
Thanks for following up!

Richard