Re: docs-common/packaging fedora-doc-common.spec, 1.5, 1.6 fedora-doc.spec.in.common, 1.2, 1.3

[Paul W. Frields]

Question about this follows, keep reading...

On Thu, 2006-01-19 at 14:50 -0500, Tommy Reynolds wrote:
>  Author: jtr
>  
>  Update of /cvs/docs/docs-common/packaging
>  In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv3874/docs-common/packaging
>  
>  Modified Files:
>  	fedora-doc-common.spec fedora-doc.spec.in.common 
>  Log Message:
>  First cut a integrating the RPM packaging stuff with the
>  "docs-common/Makefile.common" infrastructure.  While this appears to
>  work *somewhat* with the "example-tutorial", it is certainly not
>  ready for prime time yet.
>  
>  TODO:
>  1) Verify that all generated RPM's have the necessary files inside.
>  2) Mangle the "../docs-common" strings in Makefiles, *.xml, to
>     reference the "/usr/share/fedora/doc" ${FDPDIR} so that we don't
>     need to bugger the RPM checksums of the files by altering them at
>     RPM install time.
>  3) Buy a beer all round.
>  
>  
>   
[...snip...]
>  Index: fedora-doc.spec.in.common
>  ===================================================================
>  RCS file: /cvs/docs/docs-common/packaging/fedora-doc.spec.in.common,v
>  retrieving revision 1.2
>  retrieving revision 1.3
>  diff -u -r1.2 -r1.3
>  --- fedora-doc.spec.in.common	21 Nov 2005 00:37:58 -0000	1.2
>  +++ fedora-doc.spec.in.common	19 Jan 2006 19:50:05 -0000	1.3
>  @@ -25,9 +25,12 @@
>   
>   %prep
>   %setup -q -n %{docbase}-%{version}
>  +# FIXME: Need to do this remapping in the RPM build section, since it
>  +# causes "rpm -V foo" to fail, even if it's done immediately after an
>  +# install...
>   for i in $RPM_BUILD_DIR/%{docbase}-%{version}/%{docbase}*.xml
>   do
>  -	%{__sed} -i 's!../docs-common/!../../docs-common/!' "$i"
>  +	%{__sed} -i 's!../docs-common/!/usr/share/fedora/doc/docs-common/!'
> "$i"
>   done 
I haven't seen that failure... I don't have any wacky RPM macros AFAIK,
and if I build the example-tutorial RPM and install, "rpm -V
example-tutorial" returns an okey-doke.  Doesn't the package
checksumming, etc., come after %install?

-- 
Paul W. Frields, RHCE                          http://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
 Fedora Documentation Project: http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/

docs-common/packaging fedora-doc-common.spec, 1.5, 1.6 fedora-doc.spec.in.common, 1.2, 1.3

[Tommy Reynolds]

Uttered "Paul W. Frields" <stickster(a)gmail.com&gt;, spake thus:

>  > +# FIXME: Need to do this remapping in the RPM build section,
> since it
>  > +# causes "rpm -V foo" to fail, even if it's done immediately after
> an
>  > +# install...
>  >  for i in $RPM_BUILD_DIR/%{docbase}-%{version}/%{docbase}*.xml
>  >  do
>  > -	%{__sed} -i 's!../docs-common/!../../docs-common/!' "$i"
>  > +	%{__sed} -i 's!../docs-common/!/usr/share/fedora/doc/docs-common/!'
> "$i"
>  >  done
>  I haven't seen that failure... I don't have any wacky RPM macros AFAIK,
>  and if I build the example-tutorial RPM and install, "rpm -V
>  example-tutorial" returns an okey-doke.  Doesn't the package
>  checksumming, etc., come after %install? 
I hadn't actually seen that either.  That's really a note to
investigate this behavior.  If we keep this to the %prep section we
should be OK.

Cheers