Re: release-notes FileSystems-it.xml, NONE, 1.1 ArchSpecific-it.xml, 1.1, 1.2 ArchSpecificPPC-it.xml, 1.1, 1.2 ArchSpecificx86_64-it.xml, 1.1, 1.2 ArchSpecificx86-it.xml, 1.1, 1.2 BackwardsCompatibility-it.xml, 1.1, 1.2 Colophon-it.xml, 1.1, 1.2 Data

[Yuan Yijun]

2006/1/9, tombo Francesco Tombolini <fedora-docs-commits(a)redhat.com&gt;:
>  Author: tombo
>
>  Update of /cvs/docs/release-notes
>  In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv15798
>
>  Modified Files:
>          ArchSpecific-it.xml ArchSpecificPPC-it.xml
>          ArchSpecificx86_64-it.xml ArchSpecificx86-it.xml
>          BackwardsCompatibility-it.xml Colophon-it.xml
>          DatabaseServers-it.xml DevelopmentToolsGCC-it.xml
>          DevelopmentToolsJava-it.xml Networking-it.xml
>          PackageNotes-it.xml RELEASE-NOTES-it.xml
>          SecuritySELinux-it.xml Welcome-it.xml
>  Added Files:
>          FileSystems-it.xml
>  Log Message:
>  compile ok - content need check
>
>  
Did you find anything strange in the latest -en version? Such as
trademark tags are replaced by trademark characters, and the ulink
"OpenFirmware"? There are a lot of LOCALVER replaced by "Fedora Core 5
test1", too.


--
bbbush ^_^

duplication of ids in the Release Notes

[SEKINE Tatsuo]

Hi,

In the latest release notes, section id "sn-package-notes" is
used twice. This duplication makes the HTML output broken.

[prompt]$ grep sn-package-notes *-en.xml
PackageChanges-en.xml:  <section id="sn-package-notes">
PackageNotes-en.xml:<section id="sn-package-notes">

release-notes FileSystems-it.xml, NONE, 1.1 ArchSpecific-it.xml, 1.1, 1.2 ArchSpecificPPC-it.xml, 1.1, 1.2 ArchSpecificx86_64-it.xml, 1.1, 1.2 ArchSpecificx86-it.xml, 1.1, 1.2 BackwardsCompatibility-it.xml, 1.1, 1.2 Colophon-it.xml, 1.1, 1.2 Data

[Paul W. Frields]

On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 15:25 +0800, Yuan Yijun wrote:
>  2006/1/9, tombo Francesco Tombolini
> <fedora-docs-commits(a)redhat.com&gt;:
>  > Author: tombo
>  >
>  > Update of /cvs/docs/release-notes
>  > In directory cvs-int.fedora.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv15798
>  >
>  > Modified Files:
>  >         ArchSpecific-it.xml ArchSpecificPPC-it.xml
>  >         ArchSpecificx86_64-it.xml ArchSpecificx86-it.xml
>  >         BackwardsCompatibility-it.xml Colophon-it.xml
>  >         DatabaseServers-it.xml DevelopmentToolsGCC-it.xml
>  >         DevelopmentToolsJava-it.xml Networking-it.xml
>  >         PackageNotes-it.xml RELEASE-NOTES-it.xml
>  >         SecuritySELinux-it.xml Welcome-it.xml
>  > Added Files:
>  >         FileSystems-it.xml
>  > Log Message:
>  > compile ok - content need check
>  >
>  >
>  
>  Did you find anything strange in the latest -en version? Such as
>  trademark tags are replaced by trademark characters, and the ulink
>  "OpenFirmware"? There are a lot of LOCALVER replaced by "Fedora Core 5
>  test1", too. 
Although I don't know for certain, I'm pretty sure this is a result of
the porting in of the wiki contents to XML.  The trademarks should be
marked up on their first usage in the text with proper DocBook text,
i.e.:

...<trademark class="registered">IBM</trademark> <trademark
class="trade">eServer</trademark> <trademark
class="trade">pSeries</trademark>...

-- 
Paul W. Frields, RHCE                          http://paul.frields.org/
  gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233  5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717
 Fedora Documentation Project: http://fedora.redhat.com/projects/docs/

release-notes FileSystems-it.xml, NONE, 1.1 ArchSpecific-it.xml, 1.1, 1.2 ArchSpecificPPC-it.xml, 1.1, 1.2 ArchSpecificx86_64-it.xml, 1.1, 1.2 ArchSpecificx86-it.xml, 1.1, 1.2 BackwardsCompatibility-it.xml, 1.1, 1.2 Colophon-it.xml, 1.1, 1.2 Data

[Karsten Wade]

On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 08:36 -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote:
>  On Mon, 2006-01-09 at 15:25 +0800, Yuan Yijun wrote:
>  > Did you find anything strange in the latest -en version? Such as
>  > trademark tags are replaced by trademark characters, and the ulink
>  > "OpenFirmware"? There are a lot of LOCALVER replaced by "Fedora Core
> 5
>  > test1", too. 
That has all been cleaned up.  Please use the content that has been
tagged FC-5-TEST2-TRANS-FREEZE.  You were looking at the markup before I
had cleaned it up.

>  Although I don't know for certain, I'm pretty sure this is a
> result of
>  the porting in of the wiki contents to XML.  The trademarks should be
>  marked up on their first usage in the text with proper DocBook text,
>  i.e.:
>  
>  ...<trademark class="registered">IBM</trademark> <trademark
>  class="trade">eServer</trademark> <trademark
>  class="trade">pSeries</trademark>... 
True, except we do not put trademarks on anything.  Our legalnotice now
says:

  <para>
    All other trademarks and copyrights referred to are the property of
their
    respective owners.
  </para>

That covers everything, and is lawyer approved.

So, I removed the trademark characters and did not replace them with
markup.

- Karsten
-- 
Karsten Wade, RHCE * Sr. Tech Writer * http://people.redhat.com/kwade/
gpg fingerprint:  2680 DBFD D968 3141 0115    5F1B D992 0E06 AD0E 0C41   
Content Services                          Fedora Documentation Project
http://www.redhat.com/docs   http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/DocsProject