fonts-bugs October 2008

fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org

12 participants
264 discussions

[Bug 432184] The Visibone font test does not work with the icedtea java plugin
by Red Hat Bugzilla 22 Oct '08

22 Oct '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=432184 Lillian Angel <langel(a)redhat.com> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |langel(a)redhat.com Resolution|DUPLICATE |RAWHIDE --- Comment #2 from Lillian Angel <langel(a)redhat.com> 2008-10-22 17:28:58 EDT --- will be in rawhide in the next couple of days. java-1.6.0-openjdk-1.6.0.0-1.0.b12.fc10 -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 461139] Review Request: Thabit-fonts from Arabeyes.org
by Red Hat Bugzilla 22 Oct '08

22 Oct '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 --- Comment #22 from Nicolas Mailhot <nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net> 2008-10-22 14:35:46 EDT --- please use arabeyes-thabit-fonts as package name (I'll find some reason to get VLGothic-fonts fixed later :)) -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 461139] Review Request: Thabit-fonts from Arabeyes.org
by Red Hat Bugzilla 22 Oct '08

22 Oct '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139 --- Comment #21 from Subhodip Biswas <440volt.tux(a)gmail.com> 2008-10-22 00:20:16 EDT --- i am getting confused .. lowercase or tarball name ? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 449356] Refactor gfxPangoFontGroup for user fonts
by Bugzilla＠Mozilla 22 Oct '08

22 Oct '08

1 0

[Bug 449356] Refactor gfxPangoFontGroup for user fonts
by Bugzilla＠Mozilla 22 Oct '08

22 Oct '08

Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449356 --- Comment #10 from Robert O'Callahan (:roc) (Mozilla Corporation) <roc(a)ocallahan.org> 2008-10-21 17:05:26 PDT --- One thing that would help is a big comment somewhere explaining what the overall strategy is. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 449356] Refactor gfxPangoFontGroup for user fonts
by Bugzilla＠Mozilla 22 Oct '08

22 Oct '08

Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449356 --- Comment #9 from Robert O'Callahan (:roc) (Mozilla Corporation) <roc(a)ocallahan.org> 2008-10-21 17:04:45 PDT --- + nsTArray<FontSetByLangEntry> mFontSets; This usually contains one element, right? You probably should make it nsAutoTArray<FontSetByLangEntry,1>. nsStringArray looks a lot worse than nsTArray<nsString>. I filed bug 461047 on that. + // mLangStrings owns the memory for keys to mBestLangSupportTable and + // mFontsByLang. The language support and the fonts for each lang are in + // separate tables because mFontsByLang is expected to be used only when + // no default fonts support the language. There would be a large number + // of fonts in entries for languages using Latin script but these do not + // need to be created because default fonts already support these + // languages. As we discussed, let's combine the tables into one and just allow the font list to be missing from some entries. Seems like gfxRefPtrWrap should go into XPCOM and be split into "refcounted object" and "custom-destructor object". How about nsRefObj/nsAutoObj? (The template parameter doesn't need to be a pointer, after all --- nsAutoObj would be useful for HDCs, for example). + class familyComparator { + class langComparator : familyComparator { FamilyComparator, LangComparator + if (existingFamilies.Contains(family, familyComparator())) { + continue; + } Doesn't this get a bit slow? Maybe we should make existingFamilies a hash table? + for (PRUint32 l; l < findLangMatch.Length(); ++l) { + for (PRUint32 l; l < findLangMatch.Length(); ++l) { Don't call variables 'l', it's hard to distinguish from '1' + if(FcFontSetAdd(fontSet, font)) { "if (" (3 occurrences) + while (!mFcFontSet) { + if (mHaveFallbackFonts) + return nsnull; + + SortFallbackFonts(); + mHaveFallbackFonts = PR_TRUE; + } Why is this a 'while' and not an 'if'? + gfxRefPtrWrap<FcPattern> mSortPattern; + gfxRefPtrWrap<FcFontSet> mFcFontSet; + gfxRefPtrWrap<FcCharSet> mCharSet; + nsTArray<FontEntry> mFonts; + int mFcFontsTrimmed; + PRPackedBool mHaveFallbackFonts; Comment these please. + if (mFcFontsTrimmed == mFcFontSet->nfont) { + // finished with mFcFontSet + mFcFontSet.Reset(); + mFcFontsTrimmed = 0; Why reset to 0? That just seems confusing. + const cairo_font_options_t *options = + gdk_screen_get_font_options(gdk_screen_get_default()); If we're not compiling with system cairo, this might be a problem. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 466369] font rendering is messed up after 20081007 changes
by Red Hat Bugzilla 21 Oct '08

21 Oct '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466369 --- Comment #30 from Michal Jaegermann <michal(a)harddata.com> 2008-10-21 14:50:50 EDT --- Created an attachment (id=321081) --> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=321081) sample after 20081021 changes With 20081021 round of updates, which includes pango, mesa, various xorg-x11 drivers, glibc and kernel the damage appears to be lessened. With "Best contrast" I have to look for it although it is not that difficult to find. Attatched is some sample (lower case "t") but one can find more with different glyphs. With "Best shapes" this is much easier and with "Subpixel smoothing" still blatantly obvious. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

[Bug 449356] Refactor gfxPangoFontGroup for user fonts
by Bugzilla＠Mozilla 21 Oct '08

21 Oct '08

Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=449356 Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) <mozbugz(a)karlt.net> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Attachment #342841|0 |1 is obsolete| | Attachment #344063| |review?(roc(a)ocallahan.org) Flag| | --- Comment #8 from Karl Tomlinson (:karlt) <mozbugz(a)karlt.net> 2008-10-21 04:53:18 PDT --- Created an attachment (id=344063) --> (https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/attachment.cgi?id=344063) font selection in Mozilla's PangoFcFontMap 1.0 This includes removal of gfxFontconfigUtils::mAliasTable for startup time improvement, as well as tidying up and making things more robust. It feels like jumping through a couple of hoops to use a PangoFcFontMap, but it seems worth it to avoid risks associated with replacing pango_itemize at this stage. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 0

rpms/pango/devel .cvsignore, 1.80, 1.81 pango.spec, 1.146, 1.147 sources, 1.80, 1.81
by Matthias Clasen 21 Oct '08

21 Oct '08

Author: mclasen Update of /cvs/extras/rpms/pango/devel In directory cvs1.fedora.phx.redhat.com:/tmp/cvs-serv7442 Modified Files: .cvsignore pango.spec sources Log Message: 1.22.1 Index: .cvsignore =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/pango/devel/.cvsignore,v retrieving revision 1.80 retrieving revision 1.81 diff -u -r1.80 -r1.81 --- .cvsignore 22 Sep 2008 23:55:01 -0000 1.80 +++ .cvsignore 21 Oct 2008 02:27:14 -0000 1.81 @@ -1 +1 @@ -pango-1.22.0.tar.bz2 +pango-1.22.1.tar.bz2 Index: pango.spec =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/pango/devel/pango.spec,v retrieving revision 1.146 retrieving revision 1.147 diff -u -r1.146 -r1.147 --- pango.spec 23 Sep 2008 02:52:23 -0000 1.146 +++ pango.spec 21 Oct 2008 02:27:14 -0000 1.147 @@ -8,8 +8,8 @@ Summary: System for layout and rendering of internationalized text Name: pango -Version: 1.22.0 -Release: 1.1%{?dist} +Version: 1.22.1 +Release: 1%{?dist} License: LGPLv2+ Group: System Environment/Libraries Source: http://download.gnome.org/sources/pango/1.22/pango-%{version}.tar.bz2 @@ -218,6 +218,9 @@ %changelog +* Mon Oct 20 2008 Matthias Clasen <mclasen(a)redhat.com> - 1.22.1-1 +- Update to 1.22.1 + * Mon Sep 22 2008 Behdad Esfahbod <besfahbo(a)redhat.com> - 1.22.0-1.1 - Rebuild against cairo 1.7.6 - Update cairo and glib required versions Index: sources =================================================================== RCS file: /cvs/extras/rpms/pango/devel/sources,v retrieving revision 1.80 retrieving revision 1.81 diff -u -r1.80 -r1.81 --- sources 22 Sep 2008 23:55:01 -0000 1.80 +++ sources 21 Oct 2008 02:27:14 -0000 1.81 @@ -1 +1 @@ -37a185a3cb5c1a39ade7fdc3e6c75349 pango-1.22.0.tar.bz2 +654ad7e8d414d36a0e0406935d32c3ab pango-1.22.1.tar.bz2

1 0

[Bug 464470] New: New Indic fonts (nonlatin.conf) preferences
by Red Hat Bugzilla 21 Oct '08

21 Oct '08

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: New Indic fonts (nonlatin.conf) preferences https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=464470 Summary: New Indic fonts (nonlatin.conf) preferences Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: medium Priority: medium Component: fontconfig AssignedTo: besfahbo(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: rbhalera(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: besfahbo(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com Classification: Fedora Description of problem: "Meera" is a preferred font for Malayalam over Lohit Malayalam. Similarly, Marathi, Konkani, Kashmiri, Maithili and Sindhi need to use their specific fonts over the default Lohit Hindi font. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): How reproducible: Steps to Reproduce: 1. 2. 3. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 6

← Newer
1
...
11
12
13
14
15
16
17
...
27
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

fonts-bugs October 2008