Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466369
--- Comment #29 from Michal Jaegermann <michal(a)harddata.com> 2008-10-20 15:08:22 EDT ---
I am afraid that a damage I am observing shifts. Sometimes it is rather
subtle, and I have to search for it, other times it will be blunt "up in your
face". For example, after the last round up updates to 20081020 set, which
brought a new kernel, mesa packages, xorg-x11-drv-ati, xorg-x11-server-common
and xorg-x11-server-Xorg, after a reboot I can see an extra pixel left of "l"
and something eaten in "@". Also changing font scaling may change what is
wrong or even "fix" everything. So, contrary to the original subject of this
report, troubles may started earlier than 20081007 and I simply missed it. I
cannot be even sure now how much earlier as on a casual glance everything may
look normal.
The only thing which remains constant is that if I will boot, on the same
machine, either Fedora 9 or Fedora 8 or CentOS 5.2 then I cannot find any
traces of misrendered fonts and I really tried.
Making "Rendering" into "Monochrome" in "Appearance Preferences" does "fix", in
a sense, all described troubles.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466369
--- Comment #28 from Michal Jaegermann <michal(a)harddata.com> 2008-10-20 14:13:38 EDT ---
The radeon card in question happens to be "ATI Technologies Inc R300 AD [Radeon
9500 Pro]". It does not work with radeonhd. Documentation says so but just in
case I tried and documentation is correct.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466369
--- Comment #27 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <rpm(a)greysector.net> 2008-10-20 08:17:44 EDT ---
If it's a radeon HDxxxx card, could you try with the radeonhd driver? Just
curious if it makes a difference.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=467507
Rahul Sundaram <sundaram(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-list@redh
| |at.com
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=466369
--- Comment #26 from Michal Jaegermann <michal(a)harddata.com> 2008-10-16 16:27:13 EDT ---
Created an attachment (id=320606)
--> (https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=320606)
another sample - this time xorg-x11-drv-ati-6.9.0-27.fc10.x86_64 driver
With an update to xorg-x11-drv-ati-6.9.0-27.fc10.x86_64 a damage
seems to shift a bit but it does not disappear. On the attached
sample look at "2", "L", "Y" and "s". This is with "Best contrast".
Trying this with "Subpixel smoothing" makes it much worse. Hinting
seems to revert to "Full" does not matter how else I attempt to set it.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=70132
Eric (Sheppy) Shepherd <eshepherd(a)mozilla.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |eshepherd(a)mozilla.com
--- Comment #171 from Eric (Sheppy) Shepherd <eshepherd(a)mozilla.com> 2008-10-16 09:51:44 PDT ---
Does our implementation handle the entire spec at this point? Currently the
doc only covers absolute basics (font-family and src, with no descriptors), and
I want to be sure it covers everything we support.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453017
Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |CLOSED
Resolution| |NEXTRELEASE
--- Comment #41 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2008-10-16 02:43:48 EDT ---
I added it to comps-f10.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=461139
--- Comment #20 from Jens Petersen <petersen(a)redhat.com> 2008-10-16 02:28:24 EDT ---
Well there is VLGothic-fonts (and plenty of other mixed case packages in the
distro), but I won't fight too much. Though IMHO case in tarball names is
generally worth respecting.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.