fonts-bugs August 2012

fonts-bugs@lists.fedoraproject.org

11 participants
232 discussions

[Bug 847340] New: Malformed fontconfig config file
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 Aug '12

12 Aug '12

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847340 Bug ID: 847340 QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org Severity: unspecified Clone Of: 837521 Version: rawhide Depends On: 837521 Priority: unspecified CC: ccecchi(a)redhat.com, dueno(a)redhat.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, stefw(a)redhat.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com Assignee: ccecchi(a)redhat.com Summary: Malformed fontconfig config file Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Unspecified Reporter: mholec(a)redhat.com Type: --- Documentation: --- Hardware: Unspecified Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: abattis-cantarell-fonts Product: Fedora Upgrading: abattis-cantarell-fonts-0.0.9-2.fc18.noarch 489/2664 Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/65-0-khmeros-base.conf", line 29: Having multiple values in <test> isn't supported and may not works as expected Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/65-0-khmeros-base.conf", line 41: Having multiple values in <test> isn't supported and may not works as expected Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/65-0-khmeros-base.conf", line 53: Having multiple values in <test> isn't supported and may not works as expected Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/65-0-nhn-nanum-gothic.conf", line 8: Having multiple values in <test> isn't supported and may not works as expected Same bug as below: +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #837521 +++ Description of problem: Still no changes in the behavior in the latest version of fontconfig, but it now warns when <test> contains multiple values or <alias> contains multiple <family>s. this is because the behavior isn't intuitive and doesn't work as expected necessarily. So you better consider to fix it to make clearer what you want to do with it. For solution, if you are expecting OR operator with that rule, add more <match>s or <alias>es. if you are expecting AND operator with that rule, just add more <test>s in that <match>. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): nhn-nanum-fonts-3.020-1.fc17.src.rpm How to reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1. install the fonts package 2. fc-match Actual results: Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/65-0-nhn-nanum-brush.conf", line 8: Having multiple values in <test> isn't supported and may not works as expected Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/65-0-nhn-nanum-gothic.conf", line 8: Having multiple values in <test> isn't supported and may not works as expected Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/65-0-nhn-nanum-myeongjo.conf", line 8: Having multiple values in <test> isn't supported and may not works as expected Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/65-0-nhn-nanum-pen.conf", line 8: Having multiple values in <test> isn't supported and may not works as expected Expected results: no warnings --- Additional comment from dueno(a)redhat.com on 2012-07-04 04:57:17 EDT --- *** Bug 837548 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. *** --- Additional comment from dueno(a)redhat.com on 2012-07-04 05:01:30 EDT --- http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=329028 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 1

[Bug 837520] New: Malformed fontconfig config file
by Red Hat Bugzilla 12 Aug '12

12 Aug '12

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837520 Bug ID: 837520 QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org Severity: unspecified Version: rawhide Priority: unspecified CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, limburgher(a)gmail.com, pnemade(a)redhat.com Assignee: limburgher(a)gmail.com Summary: Malformed fontconfig config file Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Unspecified Reporter: tagoh(a)redhat.com Type: --- Documentation: --- Hardware: Unspecified Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: khmeros-fonts Product: Fedora Description of problem: Still no changes in the behavior in the latest version of fontconfig, but it now warns when <test> contains multiple values or <alias> contains multiple <family>s. this is because the behavior isn't intuitive and doesn't work as expected necessarily. So you better consider to fix it to make clearer what you want to do with it. For solution, if you are expecting OR operator with that rule, add more <match>s or <alias>es. if you are expecting AND operator with that rule, just add more <test>s in that <match>. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): khmeros-fonts-5.0-12.fc17.src.rpm How to reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1. install the fonts package 2. fc-match Actual results: Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/65-0-khmeros-base.conf", line 29: Having multiple values in <test> isn't supported and may not works as expected Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/65-0-khmeros-base.conf", line 41: Having multiple values in <test> isn't supported and may not works as expected Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/65-0-khmeros-base.conf", line 53: Having multiple values in <test> isn't supported and may not works as expected Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/65-0-khmeros-battambang.conf", line 16: Having multiple values in <test> isn't supported and may not works as expected Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/65-0-khmeros-bokor.conf", line 16: Having multiple values in <test> isn't supported and may not works as expected Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/65-0-khmeros-handwritten.conf", line 22: Having multiple values in <test> isn't supported and may not works as expected Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/65-0-khmeros-handwritten.conf", line 34: Having multiple values in <test> isn't supported and may not works as expected Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/65-0-khmeros-metal-chrieng.conf", line 16: Having multiple values in <test> isn't supported and may not works as expected Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/65-0-khmeros-muol.conf", line 29: Having multiple values in <test> isn't supported and may not works as expected Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/65-0-khmeros-muol.conf", line 41: Having multiple values in <test> isn't supported and may not works as expected Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/65-0-khmeros-muol.conf", line 53: Having multiple values in <test> isn't supported and may not works as expected Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/65-0-khmeros-siemreap.conf", line 16: Having multiple values in <test> isn't supported and may not works as expected Expected results: no warnings -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 3

[Bug 837521] New: Malformed fontconfig config file
by Red Hat Bugzilla 10 Aug '12

10 Aug '12

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837521 Bug ID: 837521 QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org Severity: unspecified Version: rawhide Priority: unspecified CC: dueno(a)redhat.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Assignee: dueno(a)redhat.com Summary: Malformed fontconfig config file Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Unspecified Reporter: tagoh(a)redhat.com Type: --- Documentation: --- Hardware: Unspecified Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: nhn-nanum-fonts Product: Fedora Description of problem: Still no changes in the behavior in the latest version of fontconfig, but it now warns when <test> contains multiple values or <alias> contains multiple <family>s. this is because the behavior isn't intuitive and doesn't work as expected necessarily. So you better consider to fix it to make clearer what you want to do with it. For solution, if you are expecting OR operator with that rule, add more <match>s or <alias>es. if you are expecting AND operator with that rule, just add more <test>s in that <match>. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): nhn-nanum-fonts-3.020-1.fc17.src.rpm How to reproducible: always Steps to Reproduce: 1. install the fonts package 2. fc-match Actual results: Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/65-0-nhn-nanum-brush.conf", line 8: Having multiple values in <test> isn't supported and may not works as expected Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/65-0-nhn-nanum-gothic.conf", line 8: Having multiple values in <test> isn't supported and may not works as expected Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/65-0-nhn-nanum-myeongjo.conf", line 8: Having multiple values in <test> isn't supported and may not works as expected Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/65-0-nhn-nanum-pen.conf", line 8: Having multiple values in <test> isn't supported and may not works as expected Expected results: no warnings -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 4

[Bug 807068] New: Please fine-tune glyphs of Tamil numerals and one symbol in Lohit Tamil font
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Aug '12

09 Aug '12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Please fine-tune glyphs of Tamil numerals and one symbol in Lohit Tamil font https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807068 Summary: Please fine-tune glyphs of Tamil numerals and one symbol in Lohit Tamil font Product: Fedora Version: 16 Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: lohit-tamil-fonts AssignedTo: psatpute(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: samjnaa(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, psatpute(a)redhat.com, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Created attachment 572886 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=572886 TTF of replacement glyphs and attestations for the same Description of problem: The Tamil digits in the Lohit Tamil font are not true to the actual printed glyphs and hence do not look so good even though the rest of the Lohit Tamil font is OTOH exceptionally of good quality. The glyph of one Tamil symbol 0BF6 TAMIL DEBIT SIGN is also not true to the printed glyphs. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 2.5.0 How reproducible: Using Lohit Tamil font, compare glyphs to existing printed glyphs. Actual results: The relative proportions, shapes and lengths of the strokes in some of the glyphs are not according to the actual usage in printing. Some changes were subtle, some were very obvious. Expected results: For maintaining high quality, the above problem should be fixed. Additional info: I have attached a small font with the replacement glyphs. Mostly they are: 1) glyphs copied from elsewhere in the font or another Lohit font (for zero) 2) existing glyphs with positioning of some nodes slightly modified If above not possible, only then I have changed the number of nodes. I have also provided the attestations from printed books. Especially please note that the Tamil zero should be perfectly circular, and the 0BF6 TAMIL DEBIT SIGN should be derived from Tamil PA ப. [In the Unicode chart, the glyph of 0BF6 is wrong and I have asked them to correct it.] Please make sure to autohint the glyphs as due to change in number of points the original hinting information might have been lost. Sorry for that. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 15

[Bug 806591] New: SHI SHII glyphs in Lohit Tamil font need to be corrected
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Aug '12

09 Aug '12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: SHI SHII glyphs in Lohit Tamil font need to be corrected https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806591 Summary: SHI SHII glyphs in Lohit Tamil font need to be corrected Product: Fedora Version: 16 Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: unspecified Priority: unspecified Component: lohit-tamil-fonts AssignedTo: psatpute(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: samjnaa(a)gmail.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, psatpute(a)redhat.com, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- Created attachment 572489 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=572489 Contains JPEG of attestation from printed book, PDF of current and desired appearance and TTF of replacement glyphs Description of problem: The SHI SHII glyphs in Lohit Tamil font need to be corrected. In both cases the vowel sign is not correctly positioned over the consonant. Further in SHI the vowel sign does not attach to the consonant at all. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 2.5.0 How reproducible: Use Lohit Tamil font. Steps to Reproduce: 1. Type ஶி ஶீ by selecting Lohit Tamil font. 2. Zoom to large size. 3. Especially note the minute gap between SHA and VS-II. Actual results: You can see that the described problem exists. Expected results: The vowel sign should be correctly positioned w.r.t. the consonant and it should correctly attach to the consonant. Additional info: Currently within the SHI SHII glyph of the Lohit Tamil font the contours for the vowel sign are separate and not unified with the consonant's contours. This causes overlapping nodes which is not recommended. Furthermore the RSB of SHI is zero, which is inappropriate. Compare the RSB values of glyphs of other consonants + VS-I. I have modified the glyphs by taking the position of the vowel signs and the RSB values of PI/PII (PA + VS-I and VS-II) as a model since the right-side contour shape of PA is closest to that of SHA. I have provided glyphs with unified and non-unified contours. Please find it in the attachment. I recommend to use the unified contours and have only given the non-unified contours in case you wish to do any other adjustment of positioning (unlikely). I have also provided attestation for the actual appearance of SHI/SHII as seen in printed books, -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 10

[Bug 829143] New: Fix Rendering of Letter RA,RI,RII per GoTN standards
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Aug '12

09 Aug '12

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829143 Bug ID: 829143 QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org Severity: unspecified Version: rawhide Priority: unspecified CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, psatpute(a)redhat.com Assignee: psatpute(a)redhat.com Summary: Fix Rendering of Letter RA,RI,RII per GoTN standards Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Unspecified Reporter: srik.lak+public(a)gmail.com Type: Bug Documentation: --- Hardware: Unspecified Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: lohit-tamil-fonts Product: Fedora Description of problem: Letter RA (ர, U+0BB0) should not use shortened form visually similar AA (◌ா, U+0BBE) for ர்,ரி,ரீ per GoTN procurement standards. Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): 2.50 How reproducible: Always Steps to Reproduce: 1. View http://translatewiki.net/wiki/User:Logicwiki/Sandbox?setlang=ta 2. See row for ர் 0BB0 0BCD on the unicode table in Lohit-Tamil font to see how Lohit-Tamil renders . (default when page loads with webfonts. Actual results: ர்,ரி,ரீ without the / in the bottom part of the glyph. Expected results: ர்,ரி,ரீ with the / in the bottom part of the glyph. http://www.tn.gov.in/gosdb/gorders/it/it_e_29_2010.pdf See last page of pdf for expected rendering. Additional info: http://www.tn.gov.in/gosdb/gorders/it/it_e_29_2010.pdf Appendix A – Valid Unicode Tamil Character Sequences Page 4 of 9 Tamil Vowel sign AA (◌ா, U+0BBE) and Tamil Letter RA (ர, U+0BB0) shall be treated as distinct from each other. As recommended by the Department of Tamil Development, Government of Tamil Nadu the letters , , not be rendered as , , (See letter No. E1/14702/99, dated 20.7.2000 from Department of Tamil Development enclosed as part of this appendix) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 20

[Bug 843202] New: Please stop renaming the font
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Aug '12

09 Aug '12

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=843202 Bug ID: 843202 QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org Severity: unspecified Version: 17 Priority: unspecified CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, kevin(a)scrye.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com Summary: Please stop renaming the font Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Unspecified Reporter: benedikt.morbach+fedora(a)googlemail.com Type: Bug Documentation: --- Hardware: Unspecified Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: linux-libertine-fonts Product: Fedora In Fedora, the "main" font of this package is named "Linux Libertine". Presumably through a fontconfig file. If you run any other distribution (or OS) and download the fonts from upstream or somewhere else, they are named "Linux Libertine O". This is bad, because for example Libreoffice will record the Fedora-only "Linux Libertine" and it will look wrong to others, even if they got the font. I propose changing the name to "Linux Libertine O" and adding an alias for the old name, as not to break things for Fedora users. I think the same applies to the Biolinum font, but I haven't checked that (iirc this has been the case for all versions that I know) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 15

[Bug 830849] New: linux-libertine-fonts fonts.conf snippet overrides liberation-fonts as fallback from Times New Roman
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Aug '12

09 Aug '12

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830849 Bug ID: 830849 QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org Severity: unspecified Version: 17 Priority: unspecified CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, kevin(a)scrye.com, tagoh(a)redhat.com Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com Summary: linux-libertine-fonts fonts.conf snippet overrides liberation-fonts as fallback from Times New Roman Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Unspecified Reporter: caolanm(a)redhat.com Type: Bug Documentation: --- Hardware: Unspecified Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: linux-libertine-fonts Product: Fedora Description of problem: Installing linux-libertine-fonts with its fonts.conf snippet makes fontconfig perfer it as a fallback from Times New Roman over Liberation Serif Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): linux-libertine-fonts-4.7.5-2.2.fc17 How reproducible: 100% Steps to Reproduce: 1. install linux-libertine-fonts and liberation-serif-fonts 2. fc-match "Times New Roman" Actual results: LinLibertine_Re-4.7.5.ttf: "Linux Libertine" "Regular" Expected results: Liberation Serif -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 6

[Bug 799384] New:=?UTF-8?Q?=20Problems=20with=20glyphs=20=D0=8D=20?=(U+040D)=?UTF-8?Q?=20and=20=D1=9D=20?=(U+045D) for Bulgarian language
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Aug '12

09 Aug '12

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug. Summary: Problems with glyphs Ѝ (U+040D) and ѝ (U+045D) for Bulgarian language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=799384 Summary: Problems with glyphs Ѝ (U+040D) and ѝ (U+045D) for Bulgarian language Product: Fedora Version: 16 Platform: Unspecified OS/Version: Unspecified Status: NEW Severity: high Priority: high Component: liberation-fonts AssignedTo: psatpute(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: atodorov(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: petersen(a)redhat.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, psatpute(a)redhat.com, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mitakataka(a)mail.bg Depends on: 659214 Classification: Fedora Story Points: --- Clone Of: 659214 Type: --- Regression: --- Mount Type: --- Documentation: --- +++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #659214 +++ Hi guys, bug #659214 adds support for some Cyrillic characters to the Liberations fonts family. M. Balabanov, a member of a localization mailing list reported a problem with the glyphs. The glyphs for CYRILLIC CAPITAL LETTER I WITH GRAVE (U+040D) is wrong (except for Mono Regular). Instead of Ѝ it is Ǹ (i.e it's swapped). The actual glyph is LATIN CAPITAL LETTER N WITH GRAVE (I just made that up, hopefully you get the point). This is with version: 1.07.1 of the fonts. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 21

[Bug 835182] New: Patch applied in liberation-fonts-1.07.2-4.fc* reverst patches applied in -2 and -3
by Red Hat Bugzilla 09 Aug '12

09 Aug '12

https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835182 Bug ID: 835182 QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org Severity: unspecified Version: 17 Priority: unspecified CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, petersen(a)redhat.com, psatpute(a)redhat.com Assignee: psatpute(a)redhat.com Summary: Patch applied in liberation-fonts-1.07.2-4.fc* reverst patches applied in -2 and -3 Regression: --- Story Points: --- Classification: Fedora OS: Unspecified Reporter: fabian+redhat(a)greffrath.com Type: Bug Documentation: --- Hardware: Unspecified Mount Type: --- Status: NEW Component: liberation-fonts Product: Fedora Hi, as the subject line suggests, the patch applied in liberation-fonts-1.07.2-4.fc* to fix #799384 (Problems with glyphs Ѝ (U+040D) for Bulgarian language) reverts the patches applied in previous revisions which were applied to fix #714191 (Glyph '1' not the same width as other numerals) and #715309 (fixed hinting problem of Liberation Sans Bold character "u" at particular point size). It thus re-opens these bugs. - Fabian -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug.

1 9

← Newer
1
...
17
18
19
20
21
22
23
24
Older →

Jump to page:

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

fonts-bugs August 2012