March 2008 - fonts-bugs - Fedora Mailing-Lists

[Bug 436610] 'yum remove glibc.ppc64' wants to remove ppc32 packages.

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: 'yum remove glibc.ppc64' wants to remove ppc32 packages. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436610 ------- Additional Comments From besfahbo(a)redhat.com 2008-03-10 05:59 EST ------- Why's that assigned to me again? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

16 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 436610] 'yum remove glibc.ppc64' wants to remove ppc32 packages.

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: 'yum remove glibc.ppc64' wants to remove ppc32 packages. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436610 dwmw2(a)infradead.org changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs- | |list(a)redhat.com AssignedTo|skvidal(a)linux.duke.edu |besfahbo(a)redhat.com -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

16 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 423031] New: [ml_IN]Chillu Glyph is not appearing

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=423031 Summary: [ml_IN]Chillu Glyph is not appearing Product: Fedora Version: rawhide Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: fonts-indic AssignedTo: rbhalera(a)redhat.com ReportedBy: aalam(a)redhat.com QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: apeter@redhat.com,eng-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com,fedora-fonts- bugs-list(a)redhat.com Description of problem: Chillu Glyph is not appearing with consonants ര [0d30]/ റ [0d31] + 0d4d + 200d = ??? ന [0d28] + 0d4d + 200d = ല [0d32] + 0d4d + 200d = ള [0d33] + 0d4d + 200d = ണ [0d23] + 0d4d + 200d = Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): fonts-malayalam-2.1.5-3.fc8 How reproducible: Everytime Steps to Reproduce: 1. Open gedit 2. type above combination with scim-rawcode 3. Actual results: Virma (0d4d) appearing as it is Expected results: virma should join with character to appear as Chillu character (combined glyph) Additional info: Screenshot! -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

16 years, 2 months

1
9
0 / 0

[Bug 354082] Slightly change font style sorting order

by gnome-control-center (bugzilla.gnome.org)

If you have any questions why you received this email, please see the text at the end of this email. Replies to this email are NOT read, please see the text at the end of this email. You can add comments to this bug at: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=354082 gtk+ | gtk | Ver: unspecified Nicolas Mailhot changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC|Nicolas.Mailhot(a)LaPoste.net |fedora-fonts-bugs- | |list(a)redhat.com -- See http://bugzilla.gnome.org/page.cgi?id=email.html for more info about why you received this email, why you can't respond via email, how to stop receiving emails (or reduce the number you receive), and how to contact someone if you are having problems with the system. You can add comments to this bug at http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=354082.

16 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 436520] OO.o font selector still broken

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: OO.o font selector still broken https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436520 ------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net 2008-03-09 17:54 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > absolutely no way am I taking this as a F-9 blocker Sure, that's why it was proposed as target, not blocker I'm not as wholly insane as it may seem sometimes -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

16 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 521049] New: Face sorting in GTK font chooser is suboptimal

by gnome-control-center (bugzilla.gnome.org)

If you have any questions why you received this email, please see the text at the end of this email. Replies to this email are NOT read, please see the text at the end of this email. You can add comments to this bug at: http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=521049 gtk+ | gtk | Ver: 2.12.x Summary: Face sorting in GTK font chooser is suboptimal Product: gtk+ Version: 2.12.x Platform: Other OS/Version: Linux Status: UNCONFIRMED Severity: normal Priority: Normal Component: gtk AssignedTo: gtk-bugs(a)gtk.org ReportedBy: Nicolas.Mailhot(a)LaPoste.net QAContact: gtk-bugs(a)gtk.org CC: behdad(a)gnome.org, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com GNOME version: Unspecified GNOME milestone: Unspecified Font face sorting in the GTK font chooser (used by the GNOME appearance applet for example) is suboptimal You get all regular faces, then all italic faces, then all bold faces, then all bold italic faces. In other words faces are sorted by font weight, then font slant, then not :( by font stretch For a complex font family like DejaVu Sans the list looks like Extralight Book Condensed Condensed Oblique (why condensed after book but condensed oblique before oblique?) Oblique Bold Condensed Bold Bold Oblique Condensed Bold Oblique I think it would be much more user-friendly to sort fonts by stretch, then weight, then slant. That would give this kind of grouping which is much more close to traditional regular/italic/bold/bolditalic groups Condensed Condensed Oblique Condensed Bold Condensed Bold Oblique Extralight Book Oblique Bold Bold Oblique MS seems to have made this choice in its next-gen font selector (last page of http://blogs.msdn.com/text/attachment/2249036.ashx) An alternative would be to expose separate stretch/slant/weight selectors gtk2-2.12.8-3.fc9.x86_64 -- See http://bugzilla.gnome.org/page.cgi?id=email.html for more info about why you received this email, why you can't respond via email, how to stop receiving emails (or reduce the number you receive), and how to contact someone if you are having problems with the system. You can add comments to this bug at http://bugzilla.gnome.org/show_bug.cgi?id=521049.

16 years, 2 months

1
1
0 / 0

[Bug 426580] New: Mathml fonts display with condensed names in applications

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=426580 Summary: Mathml fonts display with condensed names in applications Product: Fedora Version: 8 Platform: All OS/Version: Linux Status: NEW Severity: low Priority: low Component: mathml-fonts AssignedTo: rdieter(a)math.unl.edu ReportedBy: mike(a)flyn.org QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com Description of problem: Applications display condensed names for MathML fonts. For example, in AbiWord's font selection menu, the font "cmbx" is displayed. I would expect a name like urw-fonts' "Century Schoolbook." Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable): mathml-fonts-1.0-21.fc6 How reproducible: Every time Steps to Reproduce: 1. Open an application like AbiWord and look at the available fonts. Actual results: Expected results: Additional info: -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

16 years, 2 months

1
1
0 / 0

[Bug 3512] Implement font-stretch property

by Bugzilla＠Mozilla

Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3512 --- Comment #38 from David Baron [:dbaron] <dbaron(a)mozilla.com> 2008-03-07 14:16:16 PST --- Discussion about whether we should implement a temporary hack to allow these fonts to be specified does not belong in a bug about implementing the permanent solution. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

16 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 3512] Implement font-stretch property

by Bugzilla＠Mozilla

Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3512 --- Comment #37 from Bob T. <rdtennent(a)hotmail.com> 2008-03-07 12:01:51 PST --- Nicolas and I have disagreed about some simple short-term fixes for this on the Linux platform (which doesn't involve FF). But he's claimed that a short-term fix will contribute to deferring implementation of a long-term general solution of this problem on Firefox. So let me say that I do support implementation of font-stretch ASAP (though I wish a less misleading term such as "font-width" had been used). Bob T. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug.

16 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

[Bug 436520] OO.o font selector still broken

by Red Hat Bugzilla

Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: OO.o font selector still broken https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=436520 caolanm(a)redhat.com changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- OtherBugsDependingO|235705 | nThis| | ------- Additional Comments From caolanm(a)redhat.com 2008-03-07 14:44 EST ------- absolutely no way am I taking this as a F-9 blocker -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

16 years, 2 months

1
0
0 / 0

2024

2023

2022

2021

2020

2019

2018

2017

2016

2015

2014

2013

2012

2011

2010

2009

2008

2007

fonts-bugs March 2008