[Bug 430886] New: [mr_IN] In Samyak_Devanagari.ttf anchoring is not proper
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=430886
Summary: [mr_IN] In Samyak_Devanagari.ttf anchoring is not
proper
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: high
Priority: urgent
Component: samyak-fonts
AssignedTo: psatpute(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: sshedmak(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
Version-Release number of selected component: 1.1
How reproducible: Very often
Steps to Reproduce:
1.Install Samyak_Devanagri.ttf at /usr/share/fonts/samyak/
2.Open Gedit and select Marathi keyboard layout
3.Type following key sequence: किंवा कु कू र्कि
Actual results:
किंवा कु कू र्कि (vowel signs/marks not attaching at proper position of the
consonants. Anchoring not proper)
Expected results:
किंवा कु कू र्कि (marks attaches at the proper position -ie above base, below base,
prebase and postbase)
Additional info:
Ligatures and lookup tables (especially --the post base one) needs to be modified.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
16 years, 2 months
[Bug 236803] kdebase: Some UTF-8 chars not showing up in konsole
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: kdebase: Some UTF-8 chars not showing up in konsole
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=236803
cchance(a)redhat.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Keywords| |i18n
------- Additional Comments From cchance(a)redhat.com 2008-03-05 22:20 EST -------
The konsole could display the above text. However, firefox has problem on
displaying the first text. When I highlighted such text, it could be displayed
instead.
kde-filesystem-4-8.fc9.noarch
kde-settings-kdm-4.0-11.fc9.noarch
kde-l10n-Chinese-4.0.2-1.fc9.noarch
kde-i18n-Chinese-Big5-3.5.9-4.fc9.noarch
kde-i18n-Chinese-3.5.9-4.fc9.noarch
kde-settings-4.0-11.fc9.noarch
kde-settings-pulseaudio-4.0-11.fc9.noarch
kde-l10n-Chinese-Traditional-4.0.2-1.fc9.noarch
qt-3.3.8b-5.fc9.i386
qt4-x11-4.3.4-3.fc9.i386
qt4-4.3.4-3.fc9.i386
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
16 years, 2 months
[Bug 3512] Implement font-stretch property
by Bugzilla＠Mozilla
Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3512
Nicolas Mailhot <Nicolas.Mailhot(a)laPoste.net> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |Nicolas.Mailhot(a)laPoste.net
--- Comment #33 from Nicolas Mailhot <Nicolas.Mailhot(a)laPoste.net> 2008-03-05 05:31:00 PST ---
(In reply to comment #32)
> So maybe font-stretch is a red herring.
It's not. font-stretch is the only standardised way to select a condensed font
reliably (cross-platform and future-proof).
> Surely the failure of Firefox on Linux to recognize Nimbus Sans L Condensed
> is a *bug*.
If it does not appear in Firefox dialogs that would be a bug all right (I
thought this had been fixed, but Firefox definitely assumes in places you have
font family, then regular/bold/italic/bold italic, when the font reality is
more complex than that. And fonts that take advantage of this complexity are
not limited to expensive niche designer font libraries anymore).
> If web authors could specify it in a font-family
> list and Firefox would respect that request,
Even if it did appear that would not make it selectable in CSS by web authors.
Because the font family is not "Nimbus Sans L Condensed" but "Nimbus Sans L",
with the "Condensed" variant, so the font family selector won't work.
Many condensed fonts are like that and "Arial Narrow" (where Narrow is actually
part of the family name) is far from representative. It's sad that this font
(which has never been distributed on free/open platforms, and not even been
part of the "core fonts for the web" free-beer-download operation, is used as
argument to delay implementing font-stretch.
IIRC the Behdad of Pango fame had found some documents that described the font
selection algorithm used by Microsoft for OpenType fonts, and intended to
closely follow it pango/fontconfig side. This logic should probably apply to
CSS font selectors if there is any ambiguïty in the w3c specs.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
16 years, 2 months
[Bug 3512] Implement font-stretch property
by Bugzilla＠Mozilla
Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3512
--- Comment #32 from Bob T. <rdtennent(a)hotmail.com> 2008-03-05 04:37:14 PST ---
So maybe font-stretch is a red herring. Surely the failure of Firefox on Linux
to recognize Nimbus Sans L Condensed is a *bug*. (I originally thought it was
in fontconfig, but it's not.) If web authors could specify it in a font-family
list and Firefox would respect that request, a serious deficiency could be
fixed. Should I file a separate bug report?
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
16 years, 2 months
[Bug 3512] Implement font-stretch property
by Bugzilla＠Mozilla
Do not reply to this email. You can add comments to this bug at
https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3512
--- Comment #31 from David Baron [:dbaron] <dbaron(a)mozilla.com> 2008-03-04 22:08:03 PST ---
The question is whether font-stretch is more like font-style (normal / oblique
/ italic) or font-weight (normal / bold / etc.). For font-style if the
font-family given doesn't have an italic font, the family is supposed to lose.
For font-weight, the closest weight available is chosen. The CSS2 spec (which
describes font-stretch) doesn't say anything at all, but I suspect font-stretch
ought to act more like font-weight (in other words, I agree with comment 29).
(See http://www.w3.org/TR/CSS21/fonts.html#algorithm for the most current work,
but in a spec that doesn't have font stretch. Also see
http://www.w3.org/TR/css3-fonts/#font-properties and
http://www.w3.org/TR/1998/REC-CSS2-19980512/fonts.html#algorithm although
neither answers the question despite the specs having font-stretch. I haven't
actually checked if any of this is how things really work.)
That said, implementing it would let authors get to fonts that they can't
currently get to, and we probably should do so for that reason. But it's not a
top priority (which bug was filed first doesn't imply which bug is more
important to fix), and we generally try to avoid implementing things on only
one platform.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.mozilla.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
16 years, 2 months
[Bug 428924] New: does not run fc-cache
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=428924
Summary: does not run fc-cache
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: low
Component: VLGothic-fonts
AssignedTo: ryo-dairiki(a)users.sourceforge.net
ReportedBy: petersen(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: eng-i18n-bugs(a)redhat.com,fedora-fonts-bugs-
list(a)redhat.com
Description of problem:
The package does not run fc-cache in %post and %postun.
Steps to Reproduce:
1. grep fc-cache devel/VLGothic-fonts.spec
Additional info:
VLGothic is not appearing in the installer currently.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
16 years, 2 months