[Bug 453016] Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: un-fonts-core - Korean TrueType fonts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453016
------- Additional Comments From smallvil(a)get9.net 2008-07-06 08:33 EST -------
(In reply to comment #17)
> (In reply to comment #13)
> > this version is prerelease and 1.0 is stable release
> > how about you packaging version is 1.0 or 1.0.2-prerelease?
> >
> > I think a 1.0.2-stable release will take a long time
> Oh I see. So I had misunderstood the upstream versioning intention.
> Then I am sorry but better we revert to 1.0 unless there are
> strong reasons for shipping a snapshot.
revert to the 1.0 stable release
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
15 years, 10 months
[Bug 454148] Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454148
------- Additional Comments From mtasaka(a)ioa.s.u-tokyo.ac.jp 2008-07-06 08:15 EST -------
Thank you for initial comments:
For 1:
I did not know the wiki package, however as far as I check the wiki pacakage
it seems fine.
For 2:
Perhaps I've read them
For 3:
3-1: Some fedora contributor says that unless umask is set correctly fc-cache
creates
font cache in a wrong permission: ref:
http://www.redhat.com/archives/rhl-devel-list/2007-March/msg00151.html
For example, fonts-japanese package has umask scriptlet.
I don't know if this issue has been correctly fixed. If you are sure this
is not needed now please let me know it.
3-2: %defattr(0644,-,-,0755) = %defattr(-,root,root,-) and actually I don't think
fonts packages must write a explicit umask values which differs from gerenal
packaging guidelines. Are there any rationale?
5-AB: Will fix
5-C: Very intentional. Actually I don't want to have this rpm _automatically_ find
the version.
i.e. If the dependent fonts make update version, then this srpm won't build and
someone (or Matt using automated massbuild) complains to me
"your srpm won't build, please fix it", which is actually what I am
intended.
6. Calling mkfontdir on scriptlet pulls X dependent packages, which is _banned_
on current Fedora packaging: related to
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Releases/FeatureNoMoreXFS
Actually one day (before the release of F-8) all packages including core
fonts are
made to not call mkfontdir or chkfontpath on scriptlet.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
15 years, 10 months
[Bug 453017] Review Request: un-fonts-extra - Korean TrueType fonts
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: un-fonts-extra - Korean TrueType fonts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=453017
nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO
Flag| |fedora-review?,
| |needinfo?(smallvil(a)get9.net)
------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net 2008-07-06 07:33 EST -------
Ok. Please ping me there when you have a new spec ready.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
15 years, 10 months
[Bug 454078] Review Request: khmeros-fonts - Khmer free/libre font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: khmeros-fonts - Khmer free/libre font set created by Danh Hong of the Cambodian Open Institute
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454078
nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|ASSIGNED |NEEDINFO
Flag| |fedora-review?,
| |needinfo?(mnowak(a)redhat.com)
------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net 2008-07-06 07:32 EST -------
If upstream does not answer, do proceed on your own. It's important to try to
get issues fixed upstream but do not block on upstream availability too long.
I won't be available from end of July till September, so if you stray in this
zone, you'll have to wait a little or ask another reviewer. Since most of the
review is already done that should not be too difficult.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
15 years, 10 months
[Bug 454148] Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.
Summary: Review Request: monafont - Japanese font for text arts
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=454148
nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |fedora-fonts-bugs-
| |list(a)redhat.com
------- Additional Comments From nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net 2008-07-06 07:22 EST -------
Thank you for packaging a new font! This is not a formal review, just initial
advice to make sure the actual review can proceed faster later.
1. Please make sure you've followed all the steps outlined in steps 1 and 2.a of
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Font_package_lifecycle
2. Please read attentively
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Category:Fonts_packaging
3. Please try to stay as close as possible to
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Annotated_fonts_spec_template
If you feel you need to deviate (umasks, defattrs, etc) please explain in this
review why the deviation is justified.
5. Some comments on your spec after a quick overview
A. Please do not create a metapackage
B. Please adhere to our font naming conventions (mona-fonts-bitmap,
mona-fonts-sazanami etc). Unlike other distributions we do not use the ttf affix
C. please ask on fedora-devel if it's not possible to detect font package
versions automatically. Your hardcoded versions are going to bite you someday.
D. you do not need to BR gzip
6. I seem to remember other core fonts packages used to execute mkfontdir in
%post with ghosting. However we do not have any official core fonts packaging
guidelines right now. If you feel you've fully researched the subject, and found
the best solution, do not hesitate to submit a core fonts packaging guideline
draft later.
I realise this kind of package represents a lot of work (congratulations), and I
hope those comments will help you complete it.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.
15 years, 10 months