[Bug 503427] New: postrm scriptlet assumes /etc/pango/ARCH-redhat-linux-gnu exists
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: postrm scriptlet assumes /etc/pango/ARCH-redhat-linux-gnu exists
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=503427
Summary: postrm scriptlet assumes
/etc/pango/ARCH-redhat-linux-gnu exists
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: pango
AssignedTo: besfahbo(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: dcantrell(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: besfahbo(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
I installed the i586 pango package on my system to try out picasa. Didn't like
it, so I removed picasa and the required i586 packages.
Removing pango generated this message:
Erasing : pango 13/27
/var/tmp/rpm-tmp.7R5mvR: line 24:
/etc/pango/i386-redhat-linux-gnu/pango.modules: No such file or directory
I only have /etc/pango/x86_64-redhat-linux-gnu on my system.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
13 years, 10 months
[Bug 502577] New: CVE-2009-0946 freetype: multiple integer overflows
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: CVE-2009-0946 freetype: multiple integer overflows
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=502577
Summary: CVE-2009-0946 freetype: multiple integer overflows
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
URL: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Security/TrackingBugs
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Keywords: Security
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: freetype
AssignedTo: besfahbo(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: thoger(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: besfahbo(a)redhat.com, kevin(a)tigcc.ticalc.org,
fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
This is an automatically created tracking bug! It was created to ensure that
one or more security vulnerabilities are fixed in all affected branches.
For comments that are specific to the vulnerability please use bugs filed
against "Security Response" product referenced in "Blocks" field.
bug #491384: CVE-2009-0946 freetype: multiple integer overflows
When creating a Bodhi update request, please include the bug IDs of the
respective parent bugs filed against the "Security Response" product.
Please mention CVE ids in the RPM changelog when available and only close this
bug once all affected Fedora versions are fixed.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
13 years, 10 months
[Bug 495820] New: numerals aren't fixed-width in all sizes of sans font
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: numerals aren't fixed-width in all sizes of sans font
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=495820
Summary: numerals aren't fixed-width in all sizes of sans font
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: low
Component: dejavu-fonts
AssignedTo: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
ReportedBy: cje(a)btinternet.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net,
fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
in the default font and size used in firstboot the '5' digit is a slightly
different width, i think. so in the 'date and time' settings screen the text
shuffles a bit as the seconds and minutes tick through 05/15/25 etc.
ah, actually, it looks like it's a hinting problem - this happens with 'full'
and 'medium' but not with 'slight' or 'none'. not sure if that means it's a
problem with freetype rather than the font.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
freetype-2.3.9-3.fc11.i586
dejavu-sans-fonts-2.29-2.fc11.noarch
How reproducible:
always.
Steps to Reproduce:
1.install fedora
2.in firstboot go to date&time screen
3.watch the time ticking and observe text layout
alternatively log in and enable seconds display and 12 hour mode on the panel
clock and watch that.
Actual results:
layout 'jiggles' as numbers change.
Expected results:
no jiggling.
Additional info:
i think this has been like this for a year at least.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
13 years, 10 months
[Bug 490830] New: Nafees Web Naksha should drop Preferred Family name
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Nafees Web Naksha should drop Preferred Family name
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=490830
Summary: Nafees Web Naksha should drop Preferred Family name
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: nafees-web-naskh-fonts
AssignedTo: mathieu.bridon(a)gmail.com
ReportedBy: pnemade(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: johnp(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com,
mathieu.bridon(a)gmail.com
Classification: Fedora
Target Release: ---
Description of problem:
Nafees Web Naksha when installed shows only Nafees as font name in font
selection box. When other Nafees fonts installed manually all will point to
same name Nafees in font selection dialog box.This should not happen and should
show all font names from Nafees font family
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
nafees-web-naskh-fonts-1.0-5.fc11.noarch
How reproducible:
always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. install this font
2. open this font in fontforge
3. check TTFNames in FontInfo(Ctrl+Shift+F)
4. Look for Preferred Family and Family fields.
Actual results:
currently it shows font name as Nafees
Expected results:
Should show font name as Nafees Web Naksha
Additional info:
Thanks to Muhammad Saad who reported this on fedora-i18n channel.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
13 years, 10 months
[Bug 478332] New: Nimbus Mono L Bold Oblique is not really monospace
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Nimbus Mono L Bold Oblique is not really monospace
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=478332
Summary: Nimbus Mono L Bold Oblique is not really monospace
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: urw-fonts
AssignedTo: than(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: besfahbo(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: than(a)redhat.com, fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Apparently glyph 227 (or maybe 226 according to fontforge) of
/usr/share/fonts/default/Type1/n022024l.pfb has a width of 740 while all the
other glyphs in the font have width 600. This causes fontconfig to mark the
font as proportional instead of monospace. That then is causing other issues:
http://bugs.freedesktop.org/show_bug.cgi?id=17493
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
13 years, 10 months
[Bug 474514] New: file conflict on upgrading
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: file conflict on upgrading
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=474514
Summary: file conflict on upgrading
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: low
Component: dejavu-fonts
AssignedTo: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
ReportedBy: tagoh(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net,
fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
Description of problem:
Transaction Check Error:
file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSansMono-Bold.ttf from install of
dejavu-fonts-sans-mono-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package
dejavu-fonts-2.26-2.fc10.noarch
file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSansMono-BoldOblique.ttf from install of
dejavu-fonts-sans-mono-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package
dejavu-fonts-2.26-2.fc10.noarch
file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSansMono-Oblique.ttf from install of
dejavu-fonts-sans-mono-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package
dejavu-fonts-2.26-2.fc10.noarch
file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSansMono.ttf from install of
dejavu-fonts-sans-mono-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package
dejavu-fonts-2.26-2.fc10.noarch
file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSerif-Bold.ttf from install of
dejavu-fonts-serif-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package
dejavu-fonts-2.26-2.fc10.noarch
file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSerif.ttf from install of
dejavu-fonts-serif-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package
dejavu-fonts-2.26-2.fc10.noarch
file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSerif-BoldItalic.ttf from install of
dejavu-fonts-serif-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package
dejavu-fonts-experimental-2.26-2.fc10.noarch
file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSerif-Italic.ttf from install of
dejavu-fonts-serif-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package
dejavu-fonts-experimental-2.26-2.fc10.noarch
file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSerifCondensed-Bold.ttf from install of
dejavu-fonts-serif-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package
dejavu-fonts-experimental-2.26-2.fc10.noarch
file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSerifCondensed-BoldItalic.ttf from install
of dejavu-fonts-serif-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package
dejavu-fonts-experimental-2.26-2.fc10.noarch
file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSerifCondensed-Italic.ttf from install of
dejavu-fonts-serif-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package
dejavu-fonts-experimental-2.26-2.fc10.noarch
file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSerifCondensed.ttf from install of
dejavu-fonts-serif-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package
dejavu-fonts-experimental-2.26-2.fc10.noarch
file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans-Bold.ttf from install of
dejavu-fonts-sans-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package
dejavu-fonts-2.26-2.fc10.noarch
file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans-BoldOblique.ttf from install of
dejavu-fonts-sans-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package
dejavu-fonts-2.26-2.fc10.noarch
file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans-Oblique.ttf from install of
dejavu-fonts-sans-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package
dejavu-fonts-2.26-2.fc10.noarch
file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans.ttf from install of
dejavu-fonts-sans-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package
dejavu-fonts-2.26-2.fc10.noarch
file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSans-ExtraLight.ttf from install of
dejavu-fonts-sans-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package
dejavu-fonts-experimental-2.26-2.fc10.noarch
file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSansCondensed-Bold.ttf from install of
dejavu-fonts-sans-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package
dejavu-fonts-experimental-2.26-2.fc10.noarch
file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSansCondensed-BoldOblique.ttf from install
of dejavu-fonts-sans-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package
dejavu-fonts-experimental-2.26-2.fc10.noarch
file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSansCondensed-Oblique.ttf from install of
dejavu-fonts-sans-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package
dejavu-fonts-experimental-2.26-2.fc10.noarch
file /usr/share/fonts/dejavu/DejaVuSansCondensed.ttf from install of
dejavu-fonts-sans-2.26-6.fc11.noarch conflicts with file from package
dejavu-fonts-experimental-2.26-2.fc10.noarch
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
# rpm -qa | grep dejavu
dejavu-fonts-2.26-2.fc10.noarch
dejavu-fonts-experimental-2.26-2.fc10.noarch
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
13 years, 10 months
[Bug 477486] New: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=477486
Summary: Please convert to new font packaging guidelines
Product: Fedora
Version: rawhide
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: medium
Priority: medium
Component: xorg-x11-fonts
AssignedTo: xgl-maint(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: nicolas.mailhot(a)laposte.net
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: xgl-maint(a)redhat.com,
fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
This bug has been filed because we've detected your package includes one or
several font files:
repoquery -C --repoid=rawhide -f '*.ttf' -f '*.otf' -f '*.pfb'
-f '*.pfa' --qf='%{SOURCERPM}\n' |sed -e
's+-[0-9.-]*\.fc[123456789]\(.*\)src.rpm++g'|sort|uniq
Unfortunately the script
does not detect symlinks to other packages, so if that's your case, you can
close this bug report now.
Otherwise, you should know that:
- Fedora guidelines
demand the packaging of fonts in a separate package or subpackage:
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines#Avoid_bundling_of_font...
- our font packaging guidelines recently changed, and every package that ships
fonts must be adapted to the new templates available in the fontpackages-devel
package.
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackagingDrafts/Fonts_packaging_automation_...
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fedora_fonts_policy_package
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Simple_fonts_spec_template
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_for_multiple_fonts
Please make
your package conform to the current guidelines in rawhide.
If your package is not
principaly a font package, depending on a separate font package or subpackage
is the prefered solution. If your application does not use fontconfig you can
always package symlinks to the files provided by the font package and installed
in the correct fontconfig directories.
It is preferred to make a font package or
subpackage per font family, though it is not currently a hard guidelines
requirement (it may become before Fedora 11 is released). The definition of a
font family is given on
http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Fonts_spec_template_notes/font-family
The new
templates should make the creation of font subpackages easy and safe.
The
following packages have already been converted and can serve as examples: -
andika-fonts - apanov-heuristica-fonts - bitstream-vera-fonts - charis-fonts -
dejavu-fonts - ecolier-court-fonts - edrip-fonts - gfs-ambrosia-fonts -
gfs-artemisia-fonts - gfs-baskerville-fonts - gfs-bodoni-classic-fonts -
gfs-bodoni-fonts - gfs-complutum-fonts - gfs-didot-classic-fonts -
gfs-didot-fonts - gfs-eustace-fonts - gfs-fleischman-fonts - gfs-garaldus-fonts
- gfs-gazis-fonts - gfs-jackson-fonts - gfs-neohellenic-fonts -
gfs-nicefore-fonts - gfs-olga-fonts - gfs-porson-fonts - gfs-solomos-fonts -
gfs-theokritos-fonts - stix-fonts - yanone-kaffeesatz-fonts
If you have any remaining
questions about the new guidelines please ask them on fedora-fonts-list at
redhat.com
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
13 years, 11 months
[Bug 499921] New: xorg-x11-fonts-misc's description does not list "Greek fonts"
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: xorg-x11-fonts-misc's description does not list "Greek fonts"
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=499921
Summary: xorg-x11-fonts-misc's description does not list "Greek
fonts"
Product: Fedora
Version: 10
Platform: All
OS/Version: Linux
Status: NEW
Severity: low
Priority: low
Component: xorg-x11-fonts
AssignedTo: xgl-maint(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: tim(a)tim-landscheidt.de
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: xgl-maint(a)redhat.com,
fedora-fonts-bugs-list(a)redhat.com
Classification: Fedora
The description for xorg-x11-fonts-misc-7.2-6.fc9.noarch does not list "Greek".
Therefore, yum searches for "greek bitmap fonts" fail.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
13 years, 11 months