[Bug 847340] New: Malformed fontconfig config file
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=847340
Bug ID: 847340
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
Severity: unspecified
Clone Of: 837521
Version: rawhide
Depends On: 837521
Priority: unspecified
CC: ccecchi(a)redhat.com, dueno(a)redhat.com,
fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, stefw(a)redhat.com,
tagoh(a)redhat.com
Assignee: ccecchi(a)redhat.com
Summary: Malformed fontconfig config file
Regression: ---
Story Points: ---
Classification: Fedora
OS: Unspecified
Reporter: mholec(a)redhat.com
Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Hardware: Unspecified
Mount Type: ---
Status: NEW
Component: abattis-cantarell-fonts
Product: Fedora
Upgrading: abattis-cantarell-fonts-0.0.9-2.fc18.noarch
489/2664
Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/65-0-khmeros-base.conf", line 29: Having
multiple values in <test> isn't supported and may not works as expected
Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/65-0-khmeros-base.conf", line 41: Having
multiple values in <test> isn't supported and may not works as expected
Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/65-0-khmeros-base.conf", line 53: Having
multiple values in <test> isn't supported and may not works as expected
Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/65-0-nhn-nanum-gothic.conf", line 8:
Having multiple values in <test> isn't supported and may not works as expected
Same bug as below:
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #837521 +++
Description of problem:
Still no changes in the behavior in the latest version of fontconfig,
but it now warns when <test> contains multiple values or <alias> contains
multiple <family>s. this is because the behavior isn't intuitive and
doesn't work as expected necessarily. So you better consider to fix it
to make clearer what you want to do with it.
For solution, if you are expecting OR operator with that rule, add more
<match>s or <alias>es. if you are expecting AND operator with that rule,
just add more <test>s in that <match>.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
nhn-nanum-fonts-3.020-1.fc17.src.rpm
How to reproducible:
always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. install the fonts package
2. fc-match
Actual results:
Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/65-0-nhn-nanum-brush.conf", line 8:
Having multiple values in <test> isn't supported and may not works as expected
Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/65-0-nhn-nanum-gothic.conf", line 8:
Having multiple values in <test> isn't supported and may not works as expected
Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/65-0-nhn-nanum-myeongjo.conf", line 8:
Having multiple values in <test> isn't supported and may not works as expected
Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/65-0-nhn-nanum-pen.conf", line 8: Having
multiple values in <test> isn't supported and may not works as expected
Expected results:
no warnings
--- Additional comment from dueno(a)redhat.com on 2012-07-04 04:57:17 EDT ---
*** Bug 837548 has been marked as a duplicate of this bug. ***
--- Additional comment from dueno(a)redhat.com on 2012-07-04 05:01:30 EDT ---
http://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/buildinfo?buildID=329028
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
11 years, 9 months
[Bug 837520] New: Malformed fontconfig config file
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837520
Bug ID: 837520
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
Severity: unspecified
Version: rawhide
Priority: unspecified
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
limburgher(a)gmail.com, pnemade(a)redhat.com
Assignee: limburgher(a)gmail.com
Summary: Malformed fontconfig config file
Regression: ---
Story Points: ---
Classification: Fedora
OS: Unspecified
Reporter: tagoh(a)redhat.com
Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Hardware: Unspecified
Mount Type: ---
Status: NEW
Component: khmeros-fonts
Product: Fedora
Description of problem:
Still no changes in the behavior in the latest version of fontconfig,
but it now warns when <test> contains multiple values or <alias> contains
multiple <family>s. this is because the behavior isn't intuitive and
doesn't work as expected necessarily. So you better consider to fix it
to make clearer what you want to do with it.
For solution, if you are expecting OR operator with that rule, add more
<match>s or <alias>es. if you are expecting AND operator with that rule,
just add more <test>s in that <match>.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
khmeros-fonts-5.0-12.fc17.src.rpm
How to reproducible:
always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. install the fonts package
2. fc-match
Actual results:
Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/65-0-khmeros-base.conf", line 29: Having
multiple values in <test> isn't supported and may not works as expected
Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/65-0-khmeros-base.conf", line 41: Having
multiple values in <test> isn't supported and may not works as expected
Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/65-0-khmeros-base.conf", line 53: Having
multiple values in <test> isn't supported and may not works as expected
Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/65-0-khmeros-battambang.conf", line 16:
Having multiple values in <test> isn't supported and may not works as expected
Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/65-0-khmeros-bokor.conf", line 16:
Having multiple values in <test> isn't supported and may not works as expected
Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/65-0-khmeros-handwritten.conf", line 22:
Having multiple values in <test> isn't supported and may not works as expected
Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/65-0-khmeros-handwritten.conf", line 34:
Having multiple values in <test> isn't supported and may not works as expected
Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/65-0-khmeros-metal-chrieng.conf", line
16: Having multiple values in <test> isn't supported and may not works as
expected
Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/65-0-khmeros-muol.conf", line 29: Having
multiple values in <test> isn't supported and may not works as expected
Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/65-0-khmeros-muol.conf", line 41: Having
multiple values in <test> isn't supported and may not works as expected
Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/65-0-khmeros-muol.conf", line 53: Having
multiple values in <test> isn't supported and may not works as expected
Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/65-0-khmeros-siemreap.conf", line 16:
Having multiple values in <test> isn't supported and may not works as expected
Expected results:
no warnings
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
11 years, 9 months
[Bug 837521] New: Malformed fontconfig config file
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=837521
Bug ID: 837521
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
Severity: unspecified
Version: rawhide
Priority: unspecified
CC: dueno(a)redhat.com, fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Assignee: dueno(a)redhat.com
Summary: Malformed fontconfig config file
Regression: ---
Story Points: ---
Classification: Fedora
OS: Unspecified
Reporter: tagoh(a)redhat.com
Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Hardware: Unspecified
Mount Type: ---
Status: NEW
Component: nhn-nanum-fonts
Product: Fedora
Description of problem:
Still no changes in the behavior in the latest version of fontconfig,
but it now warns when <test> contains multiple values or <alias> contains
multiple <family>s. this is because the behavior isn't intuitive and
doesn't work as expected necessarily. So you better consider to fix it
to make clearer what you want to do with it.
For solution, if you are expecting OR operator with that rule, add more
<match>s or <alias>es. if you are expecting AND operator with that rule,
just add more <test>s in that <match>.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
nhn-nanum-fonts-3.020-1.fc17.src.rpm
How to reproducible:
always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. install the fonts package
2. fc-match
Actual results:
Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/65-0-nhn-nanum-brush.conf", line 8:
Having multiple values in <test> isn't supported and may not works as expected
Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/65-0-nhn-nanum-gothic.conf", line 8:
Having multiple values in <test> isn't supported and may not works as expected
Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/65-0-nhn-nanum-myeongjo.conf", line 8:
Having multiple values in <test> isn't supported and may not works as expected
Fontconfig warning: "/etc/fonts/conf.d/65-0-nhn-nanum-pen.conf", line 8: Having
multiple values in <test> isn't supported and may not works as expected
Expected results:
no warnings
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
11 years, 9 months
[Bug 807068] New: Please fine-tune glyphs of Tamil numerals and one symbol in Lohit Tamil font
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Please fine-tune glyphs of Tamil numerals and one symbol in Lohit Tamil font
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=807068
Summary: Please fine-tune glyphs of Tamil numerals and one
symbol in Lohit Tamil font
Product: Fedora
Version: 16
Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Component: lohit-tamil-fonts
AssignedTo: psatpute(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: samjnaa(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
psatpute(a)redhat.com, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Created attachment 572886
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=572886
TTF of replacement glyphs and attestations for the same
Description of problem:
The Tamil digits in the Lohit Tamil font are not true to the actual printed
glyphs and hence do not look so good even though the rest of the Lohit Tamil
font is OTOH exceptionally of good quality.
The glyph of one Tamil symbol 0BF6 TAMIL DEBIT SIGN is also not true to the
printed glyphs.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
2.5.0
How reproducible:
Using Lohit Tamil font, compare glyphs to existing printed glyphs.
Actual results:
The relative proportions, shapes and lengths of the strokes in some of the
glyphs are not according to the actual usage in printing. Some changes were
subtle, some were very obvious.
Expected results:
For maintaining high quality, the above problem should be fixed.
Additional info:
I have attached a small font with the replacement glyphs. Mostly they are:
1) glyphs copied from elsewhere in the font or another Lohit font (for zero)
2) existing glyphs with positioning of some nodes slightly modified
If above not possible, only then I have changed the number of nodes.
I have also provided the attestations from printed books. Especially please
note that the Tamil zero should be perfectly circular, and the 0BF6 TAMIL DEBIT
SIGN should be derived from Tamil PA ப. [In the Unicode chart, the glyph of
0BF6 is wrong and I have asked them to correct it.]
Please make sure to autohint the glyphs as due to change in number of points
the original hinting information might have been lost. Sorry for that.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
11 years, 9 months
[Bug 806591] New: SHI SHII glyphs in Lohit Tamil font need to be corrected
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: SHI SHII glyphs in Lohit Tamil font need to be corrected
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=806591
Summary: SHI SHII glyphs in Lohit Tamil font need to be
corrected
Product: Fedora
Version: 16
Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: unspecified
Priority: unspecified
Component: lohit-tamil-fonts
AssignedTo: psatpute(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: samjnaa(a)gmail.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
psatpute(a)redhat.com, i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
Created attachment 572489
--> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=572489
Contains JPEG of attestation from printed book, PDF of current and desired
appearance and TTF of replacement glyphs
Description of problem:
The SHI SHII glyphs in Lohit Tamil font need to be corrected. In both cases the
vowel sign is not correctly positioned over the consonant. Further in SHI the
vowel sign does not attach to the consonant at all.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
2.5.0
How reproducible:
Use Lohit Tamil font.
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Type ஶி ஶீ by selecting Lohit Tamil font.
2. Zoom to large size.
3. Especially note the minute gap between SHA and VS-II.
Actual results:
You can see that the described problem exists.
Expected results:
The vowel sign should be correctly positioned w.r.t. the consonant and it
should correctly attach to the consonant.
Additional info:
Currently within the SHI SHII glyph of the Lohit Tamil font the contours for
the vowel sign are separate and not unified with the consonant's contours. This
causes overlapping nodes which is not recommended.
Furthermore the RSB of SHI is zero, which is inappropriate. Compare the RSB
values of glyphs of other consonants + VS-I.
I have modified the glyphs by taking the position of the vowel signs and the
RSB values of PI/PII (PA + VS-I and VS-II) as a model since the right-side
contour shape of PA is closest to that of SHA. I have provided glyphs with
unified and non-unified contours. Please find it in the attachment.
I recommend to use the unified contours and have only given the non-unified
contours in case you wish to do any other adjustment of positioning (unlikely).
I have also provided attestation for the actual appearance of SHI/SHII as seen
in printed books,
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
11 years, 9 months
[Bug 829143] New: Fix Rendering of Letter RA,RI,RII per GoTN standards
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=829143
Bug ID: 829143
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
Severity: unspecified
Version: rawhide
Priority: unspecified
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, psatpute(a)redhat.com
Assignee: psatpute(a)redhat.com
Summary: Fix Rendering of Letter RA,RI,RII per GoTN standards
Regression: ---
Story Points: ---
Classification: Fedora
OS: Unspecified
Reporter: srik.lak+public(a)gmail.com
Type: Bug
Documentation: ---
Hardware: Unspecified
Mount Type: ---
Status: NEW
Component: lohit-tamil-fonts
Product: Fedora
Description of problem:
Letter RA (ர, U+0BB0) should not use shortened form visually similar AA (◌ா,
U+0BBE) for ர்,ரி,ரீ per GoTN procurement standards.
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
2.50
How reproducible:
Always
Steps to Reproduce:
1. View http://translatewiki.net/wiki/User:Logicwiki/Sandbox?setlang=ta
2. See row for ர் 0BB0 0BCD on the unicode table in Lohit-Tamil font to see how
Lohit-Tamil renders . (default when page loads with webfonts.
Actual results:
ர்,ரி,ரீ without the / in the bottom part of the glyph.
Expected results:
ர்,ரி,ரீ with the / in the bottom part of the glyph.
http://www.tn.gov.in/gosdb/gorders/it/it_e_29_2010.pdf See last page of pdf for
expected rendering.
Additional info:
http://www.tn.gov.in/gosdb/gorders/it/it_e_29_2010.pdf
Appendix A – Valid Unicode Tamil Character Sequences Page 4 of 9
Tamil Vowel sign AA (◌ா, U+0BBE) and Tamil Letter RA (ர, U+0BB0) shall be
treated as distinct from each other. As recommended by the Department of Tamil
Development, Government of Tamil Nadu the letters , , not be rendered as ,
,
(See letter No. E1/14702/99, dated 20.7.2000 from Department of Tamil
Development enclosed as part of this appendix)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
11 years, 9 months
[Bug 843202] New: Please stop renaming the font
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=843202
Bug ID: 843202
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
Severity: unspecified
Version: 17
Priority: unspecified
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, kevin(a)scrye.com,
tagoh(a)redhat.com
Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com
Summary: Please stop renaming the font
Regression: ---
Story Points: ---
Classification: Fedora
OS: Unspecified
Reporter: benedikt.morbach+fedora(a)googlemail.com
Type: Bug
Documentation: ---
Hardware: Unspecified
Mount Type: ---
Status: NEW
Component: linux-libertine-fonts
Product: Fedora
In Fedora, the "main" font of this package is named "Linux Libertine".
Presumably through a fontconfig file.
If you run any other distribution (or OS) and download the fonts from upstream
or somewhere else, they are named "Linux Libertine O".
This is bad, because for example Libreoffice will record the Fedora-only "Linux
Libertine" and it will look wrong to others, even if they got the font.
I propose changing the name to "Linux Libertine O" and adding an alias for the
old name, as not to break things for Fedora users.
I think the same applies to the Biolinum font, but I haven't checked that
(iirc this has been the case for all versions that I know)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
11 years, 9 months
[Bug 830849] New: linux-libertine-fonts fonts.conf snippet overrides liberation-fonts as fallback from Times New Roman
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=830849
Bug ID: 830849
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
Severity: unspecified
Version: 17
Priority: unspecified
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, kevin(a)scrye.com,
tagoh(a)redhat.com
Assignee: tagoh(a)redhat.com
Summary: linux-libertine-fonts fonts.conf snippet overrides
liberation-fonts as fallback from Times New Roman
Regression: ---
Story Points: ---
Classification: Fedora
OS: Unspecified
Reporter: caolanm(a)redhat.com
Type: Bug
Documentation: ---
Hardware: Unspecified
Mount Type: ---
Status: NEW
Component: linux-libertine-fonts
Product: Fedora
Description of problem:
Installing linux-libertine-fonts with its fonts.conf snippet makes fontconfig
perfer it as a fallback from Times New Roman over Liberation Serif
Version-Release number of selected component (if applicable):
linux-libertine-fonts-4.7.5-2.2.fc17
How reproducible:
100%
Steps to Reproduce:
1. install linux-libertine-fonts and liberation-serif-fonts
2. fc-match "Times New Roman"
Actual results:
LinLibertine_Re-4.7.5.ttf: "Linux Libertine" "Regular"
Expected results:
Liberation Serif
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
11 years, 9 months
[Bug 799384] New:=?UTF-8?Q?=20Problems=20with=20glyphs=20=D0=8D=20?=(U+040D)=?UTF-8?Q?=20and=20=D1=9D=20?=(U+045D) for Bulgarian language
by Red Hat Bugzilla
Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug.
Summary: Problems with glyphs Ѝ (U+040D) and ѝ (U+045D) for Bulgarian language
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=799384
Summary: Problems with glyphs Ѝ (U+040D) and ѝ (U+045D) for
Bulgarian language
Product: Fedora
Version: 16
Platform: Unspecified
OS/Version: Unspecified
Status: NEW
Severity: high
Priority: high
Component: liberation-fonts
AssignedTo: psatpute(a)redhat.com
ReportedBy: atodorov(a)redhat.com
QAContact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
CC: petersen(a)redhat.com,
fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
psatpute(a)redhat.com,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org, mitakataka(a)mail.bg
Depends on: 659214
Classification: Fedora
Story Points: ---
Clone Of: 659214
Type: ---
Regression: ---
Mount Type: ---
Documentation: ---
+++ This bug was initially created as a clone of Bug #659214 +++
Hi guys,
bug #659214 adds support for some Cyrillic characters to the Liberations fonts
family.
M. Balabanov, a member of a localization mailing list reported a problem with
the glyphs.
The glyphs for CYRILLIC CAPITAL LETTER I WITH GRAVE (U+040D) is wrong (except
for Mono Regular). Instead of Ѝ it is Ǹ (i.e it's swapped).
The actual glyph is LATIN CAPITAL LETTER N WITH GRAVE (I just made that up,
hopefully you get the point).
This is with version:
1.07.1 of the fonts.
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug.
11 years, 9 months
[Bug 835182] New: Patch applied in liberation-fonts-1.07.2-4.fc* reverst patches applied in -2 and -3
by Red Hat Bugzilla
https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=835182
Bug ID: 835182
QA Contact: extras-qa(a)fedoraproject.org
Severity: unspecified
Version: 17
Priority: unspecified
CC: fonts-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
i18n-bugs(a)lists.fedoraproject.org,
petersen(a)redhat.com, psatpute(a)redhat.com
Assignee: psatpute(a)redhat.com
Summary: Patch applied in liberation-fonts-1.07.2-4.fc* reverst
patches applied in -2 and -3
Regression: ---
Story Points: ---
Classification: Fedora
OS: Unspecified
Reporter: fabian+redhat(a)greffrath.com
Type: Bug
Documentation: ---
Hardware: Unspecified
Mount Type: ---
Status: NEW
Component: liberation-fonts
Product: Fedora
Hi,
as the subject line suggests, the patch applied in
liberation-fonts-1.07.2-4.fc* to fix #799384 (Problems with glyphs Ѝ (U+040D)
for Bulgarian language) reverts the patches applied in previous revisions which
were applied to fix #714191 (Glyph '1' not the same width as other numerals)
and #715309 (fixed hinting problem of Liberation Sans Bold character "u" at
particular point size). It thus re-opens these bugs.
- Fabian
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
11 years, 9 months