We have still to determine our goals for F37. see https://pagure.io/fedora-server/issue/79
One topic we have to care about is an open bug/rfe, we already postponed. https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=2054625
We decided to continue our discussion on mailing list. Among other things, we still disagreed a bit on how to judge z-shell.
I think we should really review server DVD content. It was basically created a decade ago, presumably with various adjustments in the meantime. But we have some unresolved issues about it still open.
If this was created a decade ago, than I would like to advocate for a complete review of the included packages in the hopes of slimming it down as much as possible for the following reasons.
1. Countries with lower bandwidth access can have a working system with a smaller download foot print when the remaining packages fulfill our specification guidelines that we hashed out in the last cycle.
2. I admit that I have never done a Fedora Server install with the full DVD, but always with the Net Install ISO. My reason for doing this is because of the fast paced updates that come with Fedora. A weekly or bi-weekly update between a Fedora Server and compared to a Debian Stable server is rather significant to see how many packages are updated each time. Since this is the case, I figure that there is not a lot of value in downloading the full DVD if when I do the first update just about every package that was installed is updated because of the number of changes between when the ISO's were minted and what updates have come through the pipeline. The pace of updates in Fedora (I'm sure still far slower than Arch) would be another good reason to slim down and limit the number of packages to just those that get a working server up for the user, since so many of those packages will need to be updated during the first update. Therefore adding a lot of additional packages to the DVD that would also need refreshing doesn't seem worth it to offer those choices at the time of install.
I may be wrong in how this works, but I'm guessing that if my server has a connection to the internet, and I do a Net Install with Kickstart with the addition of zsh, it would pull that package down during the install. If I include zsh on the DVD and they install zsh using a Kickstart install, they may still receive an update of zsh on the next update since it is an actively developed project so what have they gained by having it on the DVD? I love vim, and even though vim is a rather stable project, I'm often surprised how many times I see updates for vim during the 6 month life cycle of a release. So even in that case, what do I value by having vim on the DVD if when I do an update, I have to pull down the newest version right away after the install?
Just a few thoughts on the topic of package selection.
server@lists.fedoraproject.org