Call for Agenda for Server SIG Meeting (2015-12-15)

[Stephen Gallagher]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

I think that we should discuss our plans for how to handle Let's
Encrypt for Fedora 24. James Hogarth sent an email to the list
recently to start this discussion, but it hasn't seen a great response
yet. Let's discuss it in a higher-bandwidth situation (the meeting)
and get a plan in place for how to support it.

Any other important topics this week?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2

iEYEARECAAYFAlZuxtwACgkQeiVVYja6o6NSYQCfZxHNUgACiZmrpoa+9dYQnd4F
5RoAn1i/xMfOw59OdQf/vss1/UCeKwPu
=FIGP
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

[Corey Sheldon]

The current  ui for it  is  gonna be a major  hurdle  for those  wishing to
use  the gui.  Was talking locally with one of their devs last week that
should be  easier soon and  most  of  what I saw  license wise would be  a
non factor for acceptance.

Corey W Sheldon
Freelance IT Consultant, Multi-Discipline Tutor
Ameridea LLC, Founder, CTO
http://github.com/ameridea
Fedora Ambassador, North America
http://getfedora.org
Server Intern Staff, Citygate
http://citygate.org
(p) [phone]
Find Me  on any of the sites  I teach /frequent:
https://gist.github.com/linux-modder/ac5dc6fa211315c633c9
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
    "Have no way as way, no limitation as limitation. One must never
underestimate the power of boredom...from which creativity and laziness are
borne, which can spark great works of chaos and genius."
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
PGP: 0xe958c5d6718bf597 FP = 2930 99EB 083D D332 0752 88C4 E958 C5D6 718B
F597 linuxmodder(a)keybase.io
Tox: Corey84 || Linux-modder
9357BC6A5944A08AFC7D1EFFD61F6A73B9EABF8B2FB84ACF1DAC9A1A4D0A4705FFCCD0E5499B
Linphone: sip:linuxmodder
BitAddress:15cn1BvAFEREHk8UekJ6i9Dxi9Wbw6vzDD


On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 8:40 AM, Stephen Gallagher <sgallagh(a)redhat.com&gt;
wrote:

>  -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
>  Hash: SHA1
>
>  I think that we should discuss our plans for how to handle Let's
>  Encrypt for Fedora 24. James Hogarth sent an email to the list
>  recently to start this discussion, but it hasn't seen a great response
>  yet. Let's discuss it in a higher-bandwidth situation (the meeting)
>  and get a plan in place for how to support it.
>
>  Any other important topics this week?
> >  -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> >  Version: GnuPG v2
> >
> >  iEYEARECAAYFAlZuxtwACgkQeiVVYja6o6NSYQCfZxHNUgACiZmrpoa+9dYQnd4F
> >  5RoAn1i/xMfOw59OdQf/vss1/UCeKwPu
> >  =FIGP
> >  -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- 
>  _______________________________________________
>  server mailing list
>  server(a)lists.fedoraproject.org
>  http://lists.fedoraproject.org/admin/lists/[e-mail]
>

[Jon Stanley]

On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 8:59 AM, Corey Sheldon <sheldon.corey(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote:
>  The current  ui for it  is  gonna be a major  hurdle  for those 
> wishing to
>  use  the gui.  Was talking locally with one of their devs last week that
>  should be  easier soon and  most  of  what I saw  license wise would be  a
>  non factor for acceptance. 
I'm not sure that I can parse this.

When you say the UI, are you talking about Cockpit (the web
interface), or something else? What particular changes would you like
to see?

[James Hogarth]

On 14 Dec 2015 17:14, "Jon Stanley" <jonstanley(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote:
>  On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 8:59 AM, Corey Sheldon <sheldon.corey(a)gmail.com&gt;
wrote:
>  > The current  ui for it  is  gonna be a major  hurdle  for those
wishing to
>  > use  the gui.  Was talking locally with one of their devs last
> week that
>  > should be  easier soon and  most  of  what I saw  license wise would 
be  a
>  > non factor for acceptance.
>
>  I'm not sure that I can parse this.
>
>  When you say the UI, are you talking about Cockpit (the web
>  interface), or something else? What particular changes would you like
>  to see? 
Currently the LE client is text only either through ncurses or just text
only...

The client is licenced MIT as well so this intrigues me...

Oh the article is up on Fedora Magazine now with stuff that can be copy and
pasted to test...

[Jon Stanley]

On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 12:35 PM, James Hogarth <james.hogarth(a)gmail.com&gt; wrote:
>  Currently the LE client is text only either through ncurses or just
> text
>  only...
>
>  The client is licenced MIT as well so this intrigues me...
>
>  Oh the article is up on Fedora Magazine now with stuff that can be copy and
>  pasted to test... 

Ahh, got it! Sorry for being dense - I didn't get this as related to
the LE client. In terms of UI, I think that a really cool long-term
vision is RoleKit integration into Cockpit, and LE integration into
the httpd RoleKit role. Obviously this is a longer term vision rather
than something that we can implement in a short period of time, but I
think that it's worth keeping in the back of our mind.

As for something that we can do immediately, as you note the Fedora
Magazine article is now live. In terms of short-term adoption, I think
that gets us to where we need to be, right? A very clear set of
instructions of how to use it?