kernel 5.1.6-200.fc29.x86_64 won't boot Xen DomU
by Markus Schönhaber
Hi,
I'm running Fedora 29 in a Xen DomU on a Debian stretch Dom0. While
kernel 5.0.19-200.fc29.x86_64 works just fine, 5.1.6-200.fc29.x86_64
crashes on boot.
Is anyone else seeing this? Is there a workaround?
Regards
mks
Tail of
# xl create /etc/xen/f29.cfg -c
> [ 2.164017] BUG: unable to handle kernel paging request at ffffc90000ceb818
> [ 2.164120] #PF error: [normal kernel read fault]
> [ 2.164190] PGD 7dbda067 P4D 7dbda067 PUD 7dbd9067 PMD 78104067 PTE 0
> [ 2.164281] Oops: 0000 [#1] SMP NOPTI
> [ 2.164281] CPU: 0 PID: 1 Comm: swapper/0 Not tainted 5.1.6-200.fc29.x86_64 #1
> [ 2.164281] RIP: e030:pmc_core_probe+0xd1/0x2b8
> [ 2.164281] Code: c2 a0 15 ac 82 48 c7 c6 5a f4 17 82 48 c7 c7 e8 15 ac 82 e8 ce a6 95 fe 48 8b 05 97 70 2e 00 48 63 40 44 48 03 05 84 70 2e 00 <8b> 00 48 8b 15 83 70 2e 00 31 f6 48 c7 c7 68 f4 17 82 8b 4a 48 ba
> [ 2.164281] RSP: e02b:ffffc9000071be10 EFLAGS: 00010286
> [ 2.164281] RAX: ffffc90000ceb818 RBX: 0000000000000000 RCX: 0000000000000000
> [ 2.164281] RDX: ffffffff82ac15a0 RSI: ffffffff8217f45a RDI: ffffffff82ac15e8
> [ 2.164281] RBP: ffffffff827da473 R08: 8000000000000073 R09: ffff88807d001600
> [ 2.164281] R10: 0000000000007ff0 R11: 0000000000000001 R12: ffffffff829557a0
> [ 2.164281] R13: ffffffff8276a73b R14: 0000000000000000 R15: 0000000000000000
> [ 2.164281] FS: 0000000000000000(0000) GS:ffff88807d400000(0000) knlGS:0000000000000000
4 years, 11 months
Re: New mailing lists available for podman/libpod
by Daniel Walsh
On 6/13/19 3:14 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 3:13 PM Daniel Walsh <dwalsh(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>> Send an email to: podman-join(a)lists.podman.io with the word "subscribe"
>> in the title, or by going to https://lists.podman.io and scrolling to
>> the bottom of that page to subscribe.
>>
> Could FAS login be added as a supported auth?
>
>
FAS Loging now supported.
4 years, 11 months
Re: New mailing lists available for podman/libpod
by Daniel Walsh
On 6/13/19 3:14 PM, Neal Gompa wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 13, 2019 at 3:13 PM Daniel Walsh <dwalsh(a)redhat.com> wrote:
>> Send an email to: podman-join(a)lists.podman.io with the word "subscribe"
>> in the title, or by going to https://lists.podman.io and scrolling to
>> the bottom of that page to subscribe.
>>
> Could FAS login be added as a supported auth?
>
>
It should be enabled now.
4 years, 11 months
Method to create local font server so that browser gets fonts from
locally installed fonts.
by stan
Fedora provides lots of fonts, and I have lots of them installed. I
would like the browser to use them instead of going out on the web to
find fonts for pages it is rendering. A nice to have feature would be a
mapping of common fonts to substitute fonts if they aren't available.
For instance, if a web page calls for Times-Roman, and I don't have that
installed, the server substitutes a reasonable alternative. This would
be mapped to things like fonts.googleapis.com so that I would still get
a reasonable font when the browser wants to call there, but gets the
local font server instead.
Is there such a thing already in Fedora? If there isn't, would it be
easy to create such a thing with existing tools?
As an alternative, could I compile the local fonts into firefox so that
they are directly available?
4 years, 11 months
No match for argument: podman
by Frank Elsner
Hello,
I have learned that there is podman, but all my Fedora 29 systems dont't know about it :-(
When I try to install I get:
[root@siffux tmp]# dnf install podman
Adobe Systems Incorporated 16 kB/s | 2.9 kB 00:00
Fedora Modular 29 - i386 27 kB/s | 3.6 kB 00:00
Fedora Modular 29 - i386 - Updates 54 kB/s | 8.1 kB 00:00
Fedora 29 - i386 - Updates 64 kB/s | 8.8 kB 00:00
Fedora 29 - i386 31 kB/s | 3.7 kB 00:00
RPM Fusion for Fedora 29 - Free - Updates 15 kB/s | 9.3 kB 00:00
RPM Fusion for Fedora 29 - Free 18 kB/s | 10 kB 00:00
RPM Fusion for Fedora 29 - Nonfree - Updates 17 kB/s | 9.5 kB 00:00
RPM Fusion for Fedora 29 - Nonfree 18 kB/s | 10 kB 00:00
vivaldi 58 kB/s | 2.9 kB 00:00
No match for argument: podman
Error: Unable to find a match
[root@siffux tmp]#
Whats going on? I guess thespelling is correct.
Regards, Frank
4 years, 11 months
dnf mystery
by ToddAndMargo
Hi All,
I need a second pair of eye here. I think I am typo'ing something
On the third server, I am trying to upgrade xrdp to match the
first two
On two Fedora 30 servers,
$ rpm -qa xrdp
xrdp-0.9.10-1.fc30.x86_64
$ dnf whatprovides xrdp
...
xrdp-1:0.9.10-1.fc30.x86_64 : Open source remote desktop
protocol (RDP) server
Repo : @System
Matched from:
Provide : xrdp = 1:0.9.10-1.fc30
But on a third, I get
# cat /etc/redhat-release
Fedora release 30 (Thirty)
# rpm -qa xrdp
xrdp-0.9.2-12.fc26.x86_64
# dnf --enablerepo=* whatprovides xrdp
Last metadata expiration check: 0:00:47 ago on Fri 07
Jun 2019 12:31:00 PM PDT.
Error: No Matches found
# dnf --enablerepo=* upgrade xrdp
Last metadata expiration check: 0:07:40 ago on Fri 07 Jun
2019 12:31:00 PM PDT.
No match for argument: xrdp
Error: No packages marked for upgrade.
# dnf --enablerepo=* install xrdp
Last metadata expiration check: 0:07:59 ago on Fri 07
Jun 2019 12:31:00 PM PDT.
No match for argument: xrdp
Error: Unable to find a match
Now it gets even weirder. I download xrdp from the repo:
# dnf install xrdp-1:0.9.10-1.fc30.x86_64
Last metadata expiration check: 0:12:22 ago on Fri 07 Jun 2019
12:30:06 PM PDT.
No match for argument: xrdp-1:0.9.10-1.fc30.x86_64
Error: Unable to find a match
This worked:
# rpm -Uvh xrdp-selinux-0.9.10-1.fc30.x86_64.rpm
xrdp-0.9.10-1.fc30.x86_64.rpm
...Cleaning up / removing...
3:xrdp-1:0.9.2-12.fc26 [100%]
# rpm -qa xrdp
xrdp-0.9.10-1.fc30.x86_64
I am really confused!
-T
4 years, 11 months
How to sign a locally compiled kernel so it can be booted with
UEFI.
by stan
I compiled a fedora kernel locally. When I tried to boot it in UEFI,
it failed because it wasn't signed. Which it is supposed to.
I then searched and found the procedure for generating local keys
using openssl, getting the public key into mok, generating the
certificate, the pkcs12 structure, putting it in the pesign database,
signing the kernel, and rebooting.
It still doesn't boot. Is there anyone here who has a successful
technique for signing a locally compiled kernel so it will boot under
UEFI?
I found some extreme measures like taking over all signing, but I think
it is a little early for those. And, of course, I could turn off
secure boot, but I'll give it a chance before doing that.
Thanks.
4 years, 11 months
Email Client
by Douglas G Mckendrick
Evening all,
I'm after setting up an email client, I've tried thunderbird for my gmail
account, but I get a google complaint about the client not being secure
enough. Is there another recommended email client? Or can we make
thunderbird more secure to pass the google checks?
Thanks in advance
D.
4 years, 11 months
disable password dialog pop-up
by Amadeus WM
I have a file that I encrypt using gpg like this:
cat foobar | gpg --symmetric > foobar.gpg
Up until Fedora 30, it was prompting me for the password right there, at
the prompt. In Fedora 30 it pops up a dialog, which I find very annoying.
I don't know if this is related to gnome-keyring. Is there a way to
disable it?
Thanks!
4 years, 11 months