users November 2020

users@lists.fedoraproject.org

127 participants
147 discussions

Re: F32 bind9 split dns debug
by J.Witvliet＠mindef.nl 16 Nov '20

16 Nov '20

How about: “lsof -i -n -P” From: "Jack Craig" <jack.craig.aptos(a)gmail.com<mailto:jack.craig.aptos@gmail.com>> Date: Saturday, 14 November 2020 at 21:11:39 To: "Community support for Fedora users" <users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org<mailto:users@lists.fedoraproject.org>> Subject: Re: F32 bind9 split dns debug is there an easier way to verify a port access to internal host besides wireshark & tcpdump? On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 11:51 AM Jack Craig <jack.craig.aptos(a)gmail.com<mailto:jack.craig.aptos@gmail.com>> wrote: On Sat, Nov 14, 2020 at 11:33 AM Jack Craig <jack.craig.aptos(a)gmail.com<mailto:jack.craig.aptos@gmail.com>> wrote: this part looked ok to me, but i am not sure. now seeing higher throughput, but still got... 14-Nov-2020 11:28:20.993 query-errors: info: client @0x7fc8601c9760 52.183.97.231#63450 (linuxlighthouse.com<http://linuxlighthouse.com>): view external-wan-view: query failed (REFUSED) for linuxlighthouse.com/IN/A<http://linuxlighthouse.com/IN/A> at ../../../bin/named/query.c:7270 14-Nov-2020 11:28:21.030 query-errors: info: client @0x7fc8601c9760 20.190.57.96#61806 (www.linuxlighthouse.com<http://www.linuxlighthouse.com>): view external-wan-view: query failed (REFUSED) for www.linuxlighthouse.com/IN/A<http://www.linuxlighthouse.com/IN/A> at ../../../bin/named/query.c:7270 14-Nov-2020 11:28:21.047 query-errors: info: client @0x7fc8601c9760 51.143.102.160#49893 (www.linuxlighthouse.com<http://www.linuxlighthouse.com>): view external-wan-view: query failed (REFUSED) for www.linuxlighthouse.com/IN/NS<http://www.linuxlighthouse.com/IN/NS> at ../../../bin/named/query.c:7270 how can i see/test a query's processing between default.log & security.log ? i can see the query, if i could see why it's failing, i'd query this list less. ;) www.linuxlighthouse.com/IN/NS<http://www.linuxlighthouse.com/IN/NS> at ../../../bin/named/query.c:7270 i looked at the query.c @7270 but was unable to gleen any useful insight. WRT networking, my block of static ip's is from att.com<http://att.com> i have cascaded routers from att's pace unit to a netgear night hawk that does port fwding for 53, 80 443 to the 10.0.0.101 sever. i use the firewall on the att rtr limiting to the above ports to pass through. the NH logs show connects to 53,80, & 443 i also cranked debug to 10 in named logging, but so far,... lastly, as F32 comes w/iptables, i migrated to nftables. Dit bericht kan informatie bevatten die niet voor u is bestemd. Indien u niet de geadresseerde bent of dit bericht abusievelijk aan u is toegezonden, wordt u verzocht dat aan de afzender te melden en het bericht te verwijderen. De Staat aanvaardt geen aansprakelijkheid voor schade, van welke aard ook, die verband houdt met risico's verbonden aan het elektronisch verzenden van berichten. This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you are not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you are requested to inform the sender and delete the message. The State accepts no liability for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent in the electronic transmission of messages.

2 1

F32 UEFI reboot complete OK if 'cold/hard'; but 'warm/soft' reboot hangs after Grub menu entry is selected ?
by PGNet Dev 15 Nov '20

15 Nov '20

I've built up an older box (ASRock J1900D2Y mobo), on Fedora32 + kernel 5.8.18 + grub 2.04 (from F32 pkgs), booting UEFI. I can cold boot -- or hard reboot -- the box, and it boots to desktop with no problems. Afaict, everything's up & running without issue. But, on SOFT reboot -- via either `shutdown -r now` or `systemctl start reboot.target`, the system DOES start the reboot. UEFI boot passes to grub menu as usual, latest kernel is selected, and then ... ... nothing. Just sits there. No further error logging, or progress -- even at serial console with kernel/systemd debug logging turned up. A cold, power-cycling reboot immediately fixes the problem -- e.g., after an IPMI 'Reset', the system again boots fine. Since cold boot is OK, seems kernel & initrd are ok. Since the issue arises only AFTER grub menu's in the picture, it doesn't seem that BIOS/UEFI should be involved in any way. Any hints as to where to dig around next? Or suggestions how to workaround?

2 2

Default Windows position
by ToddAndMargo 15 Nov '20

15 Nov '20

Hi All, Fedora 33 Xfce 4.14 Since --geometry has been discontinued so many places, I have been temporarily altering leafpad's rc file to set a custom window size and font (read in, write out custom settings, start leafpad, restore original settings). Problem: I have yet to figure out where Leafpad (or others) get their default position from. $ cat ./.config/leafpad/leafpadrc 0.8.18.1 885 <-- X 545 <-- Y Monospace 12 <-- Font size 0 0 0 Any idea where I find that? Many thanks, -T -- ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Computers are like air conditioners. They malfunction when you open windows ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

3 4

Re: systemd-resolved breakage
by J.Witvliet＠mindef.nl 14 Nov '20

14 Nov '20

No. It is a malignant carcinoma. From: "Tom Horsley" <horsley1953(a)gmail.com<mailto:horsley1953@gmail.com>> Date: Saturday, 14 November 2020 at 15:16:35 To: "users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org" <users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org<mailto:users@lists.fedoraproject.org>> Subject: Re: systemd-resolved breakage On Sat, 14 Nov 2020 11:56:01 +0100 Tom H wrote: > > Yes, system is being shoved down your gullet, whether you like it > > or not. > > Whichever distribution you use, you're at the mercy of its developers. > In this particular case, the developer responsible for the change > didn't care about breaking some users' setups by not forcing this > change for upgrades. That's life. There are computer viruses, then there's systemd - the world's only computer fungus - it keeps growing over more and more of the system :-). _______________________________________________ users mailing list -- users(a)lists.fedoraproject.org To unsubscribe send an email to users-leave(a)lists.fedoraproject.org Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/users@lists.fedoraproject.org Dit bericht kan informatie bevatten die niet voor u is bestemd. Indien u niet de geadresseerde bent of dit bericht abusievelijk aan u is toegezonden, wordt u verzocht dat aan de afzender te melden en het bericht te verwijderen. De Staat aanvaardt geen aansprakelijkheid voor schade, van welke aard ook, die verband houdt met risico's verbonden aan het elektronisch verzenden van berichten. This message may contain information that is not intended for you. If you are not the addressee or if this message was sent to you by mistake, you are requested to inform the sender and delete the message. The State accepts no liability for damage of any kind resulting from the risks inherent in the electronic transmission of messages.

2 1

bugzilla.gnome.org is closing
by ToddAndMargo 14 Nov '20

14 Nov '20

Hi All, I just got a notification that bugzilla.gnome.org is being replaced by gitlab.gnome.org and that they are starting over. -T

6 7

unable to access localhost
by Geoffrey Leach 13 Nov '20

13 Nov '20

System is running up-to-date Fedora 32. root@webster[3]->mailx -v -v -s test geoff(a)hughes.net </dev/null Null message body; hope that's ok geoff(a)hughes.net... Connecting to [127.0.0.1] via relay... geoff(a)hughes.net... Deferred: Connection refused by [127.0.0.1] root@webster[6]->ping 127.0.0.1 PING 127.0.0.1 (127.0.0.1) 56(84) bytes of data. 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=1 ttl=64 time=0.080 ms 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=2 ttl=64 time=0.086 ms 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=3 ttl=64 time=0.091 ms 64 bytes from 127.0.0.1: icmp_seq=4 ttl=64 time=0.103 ms ^C --- 127.0.0.1 ping statistics --- 4 packets transmitted, 4 received, 0% packet loss, time 3096ms rtt min/avg/max/mdev = 0.080/0.090/0.103/0.008 ms Suggestions for cause/diagnosis would be appreciated.

3 6

Gedit and no geometry?
by ToddAndMargo 13 Nov '20

13 Nov '20

Hi All, Looking at uboboo's man page for gedit, it has a --geometry command line switch; http://manpages.ubuntu.com/manpages/xenial/en/man1/gedit.1.html But our's does not. Are we way out of date? Do we have test editor with a geometry switch? -T

3 5

ps2eps
by Patrick Dupre 13 Nov '20

13 Nov '20

Hello, Has the package ps2eps been removed from the distribution? What is the alternative? Thanks =========================================================================== Patrick DUPRÉ | | email: pdupre(a)gmx.com Laboratoire interdisciplinaire Carnot de Bourgogne 9 Avenue Alain Savary, BP 47870, 21078 DIJON Cedex FRANCE Tel: +33 (0)380395988 ===========================================================================

3 2

Re: Need help with rsync
by ToddAndMargo 13 Nov '20

13 Nov '20

On 2020-11-13 00:37, Cameron Simpson wrote: > On 12Nov2020 20:38, ToddAndMargo <ToddAndMargo(a)zoho.com> wrote: >> But the question still arises, why did the command stop >> pruning after it found the bad link? It still updated. > > Rsync does that. I think it's just caution. The delete phase is sort of > separate (runs last by default, but that is tunable). I think it thinks > the update failed in some way, so stop now. > > Cheers, > Cameron Simpson <cs(a)cskk.id.au> > Hi Cameron, Makes sense. Thank you for the confirmation! -T

1 0

Recommendations for video-conferencing setup
by Patrick O'Callaghan 13 Nov '20

13 Nov '20

I occasionally participate in Zoom calls using my Android tablet, and everything Just Works(tm). I'd like to do the same on my desktop with Fedora, but despite testing three different cheap webcams the big issue is always with the sound. I can hear the other people perfectly, and the video is fine, but the audio from my side is muddy and nearly impossible to understand. I've tried with and without headphones in case it's a feedback issue (though not using the headphone mic). It doesn't make any difference. Surely not all the webcam mics can be so bad? How would anyone ever use them? Is there some Pulse filter I can use to improve the audio quality? What are people doing in this situation? poc

12 31

← Newer
1
...
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
...
15
Older →

Jump to page: