F9: Canon LBP2900 no go: "usblp1: error -32 reading printer status"

[Colin Brace]

Hi all,

I am trying to get a Canon LBP2900 laser printer working under F9.

Alas, the driver is (apparently) closed and not included in the Caps 
package, which might be a reason to avoid this printer, but be that as 
it may, one can download a Linux driver easily enough from Canon:

http://software.canon-europe.com/products/0010177.asp

These are the latest RPMs:

2007-12-03 08:49 cndrvcups-capt-1.60-1.i386.rpm
2007-12-03 08:49 cndrvcups-common-1.60-1.i386.rpm

Once installed, CAPS automatically recognizes the printer and selects 
what appears to be the correct driver:

Canon LBP2900 CAPT ver.1.5

Likewise, the printer shows up properly in dmesg:

usb 1-4: new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 26
usb 1-4: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice
usblp1: USB Bidirectional printer dev 26 if 0 alt 0 proto 2 vid 0x04A9 
pid 0x2676
usb 1-4: New USB device found, idVendor=04a9, idProduct=2676
usb 1-4: New USB device strings: Mfr=1, Product=2, SerialNumber=3
usb 1-4: Product: Canon CAPT USB Device
usb 1-4: Manufacturer: Canon
usb 1-4: SerialNumber: 0000A380HGkZ

but if I try a test page, nothing happens. The only indication that 
something is wrong is this error message repeatedly displayed in dmesg:

usblp1: error -32 reading printer status

Any ideas what is going on here?

Thanks.

-- 
  Colin Brace
  Amsterdam
  http://www.lim.nl

[Kevin Martin]

Colin Brace wrote:
>  Hi all,
>
>  I am trying to get a Canon LBP2900 laser printer working under F9.
>
>  Alas, the driver is (apparently) closed and not included in the Caps 
>  package, which might be a reason to avoid this printer, but be that as 
>  it may, one can download a Linux driver easily enough from Canon:
>
>  http://software.canon-europe.com/products/0010177.asp
>
>  These are the latest RPMs:
>
>  2007-12-03 08:49 cndrvcups-capt-1.60-1.i386.rpm
>  2007-12-03 08:49 cndrvcups-common-1.60-1.i386.rpm
>
>  Once installed, CAPS automatically recognizes the printer and selects 
>  what appears to be the correct driver:
>
>  Canon LBP2900 CAPT ver.1.5
>
>  Likewise, the printer shows up properly in dmesg:
>
>  usb 1-4: new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 26
>  usb 1-4: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice
>  usblp1: USB Bidirectional printer dev 26 if 0 alt 0 proto 2 vid 0x04A9 
>  pid 0x2676
>  usb 1-4: New USB device found, idVendor=04a9, idProduct=2676
>  usb 1-4: New USB device strings: Mfr=1, Product=2, SerialNumber=3
>  usb 1-4: Product: Canon CAPT USB Device
>  usb 1-4: Manufacturer: Canon
>  usb 1-4: SerialNumber: 0000A380HGkZ
>
>  but if I try a test page, nothing happens. The only indication that 
>  something is wrong is this error message repeatedly displayed in dmesg:
>
>  usblp1: error -32 reading printer status
>
>  Any ideas what is going on here?
>
>  Thanks.
>  

What does lpstat -t show?  Is the printer enabled?

Kevin

[Colin Brace]

Kevin Martin wrote:
>  
>  What does lpstat -t show?  Is the printer enabled?
>   
$ lpstat -t
scheduler is running
no system default destination
device for LBP2900: usb://Canon/LBP2900
device for Lexmark_Z51: usb://Lexmark/Z51
LBP2900 accepting requests since Tue 10 Jun 2008 08:22:11 PM CEST
Lexmark_Z51 accepting requests since Tue 10 Jun 2008 01:06:21 PM CEST
printer LBP2900 is idle.  enabled since Tue 10 Jun 2008 08:22:11 PM CEST
	Printer is now on-line.
printer Lexmark_Z51 is idle.  enabled since Tue 10 Jun 2008 01:06:21 PM CEST

Is this what you mean by "enabled"?



-----
  Colin Brace
  Amsterdam
  http://lim.nl
-- 
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/F9%3A-Canon-LBP2900-no-go%3A-%22usblp1%3A-error--32...
Sent from the Fedora List mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

[Kevin Martin]

Colin_Brace wrote:
>  Kevin Martin wrote:
>    
> > What does lpstat -t show?  Is the printer enabled?
> >
> >     
>
>  $ lpstat -t
>  scheduler is running
>  no system default destination
>  device for LBP2900: usb://Canon/LBP2900
>  device for Lexmark_Z51: usb://Lexmark/Z51
>  LBP2900 accepting requests since Tue 10 Jun 2008 08:22:11 PM CEST
>  Lexmark_Z51 accepting requests since Tue 10 Jun 2008 01:06:21 PM CEST
>  printer LBP2900 is idle.  enabled since Tue 10 Jun 2008 08:22:11 PM CEST
>  	Printer is now on-line.
>  printer Lexmark_Z51 is idle.  enabled since Tue 10 Jun 2008 01:06:21 PM CEST
>
>  Is this what you mean by "enabled"?
>
>
>
>  -----
>    Colin Brace
>    Amsterdam
>    http://lim.nl
>     
Yes, that's what I meant.  Are there any other messages in  
/var/log/messages about usb/printer/printing/Lexmark?

Kevin

[Kevin Martin]

Kevin Martin wrote:
>  Colin_Brace wrote:
> > Kevin Martin wrote:
> >   
> >> What does lpstat -t show?  Is the printer enabled?
> >>
> >>     
> >
> > $ lpstat -t
> > scheduler is running
> > no system default destination
> > device for LBP2900: usb://Canon/LBP2900
> > device for Lexmark_Z51: usb://Lexmark/Z51
> > LBP2900 accepting requests since Tue 10 Jun 2008 08:22:11 PM CEST
> > Lexmark_Z51 accepting requests since Tue 10 Jun 2008 01:06:21 PM CEST
> > printer LBP2900 is idle.  enabled since Tue 10 Jun 2008 08:22:11 PM CEST
> > 	Printer is now on-line.
> > printer Lexmark_Z51 is idle.  enabled since Tue 10 Jun 2008 01:06:21 PM CEST
> >
> > Is this what you mean by "enabled"?
> >
> >
> >
> > -----
> >   Colin Brace
> >   Amsterdam
> >   http://lim.nl
> >   
>
>  Yes, that's what I meant.  Are there any other messages in  
>  /var/log/messages about usb/printer/printing/Lexmark?
>
>  Kevin 
of course, I meant Canon, not Lexmark. 

However, is the LexMark printer working correctly?

Kevin

[Colin Brace]

Kevin Martin wrote:
>  of course, I meant Canon, not Lexmark. 
>  However, is the LexMark printer working correctly?
>   
I realized that. ;)  Yes, the Z51 works fine.

Nothing else to report from the kernel log; just hundreds of these:

usblp1: error -32 reading printer status

Google turns up only a very small number of hits for this, none of which
shed any light on the matter for me. 

Any suggestions most welcome. 

Thanks.

-----
  Colin Brace
  Amsterdam
  http://lim.nl
-- 
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/F9%3A-Canon-LBP2900-no-go%3A-%22usblp1%3A-error--32...
Sent from the Fedora List mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

[Kevin Martin]

Colin_Brace wrote:
>  Kevin Martin wrote:
>    
> > of course, I meant Canon, not Lexmark. 
> > However, is the LexMark printer working correctly?
> >
> >     
>
>  I realized that. ;)  Yes, the Z51 works fine.
>
>  Nothing else to report from the kernel log; just hundreds of these:
>
>  usblp1: error -32 reading printer status
>
>  Google turns up only a very small number of hits for this, none of which
>  shed any light on the matter for me. 
>
>  Any suggestions most welcome. 
>
>  Thanks.
>
>  -----
>    Colin Brace
>    Amsterdam
>    http://lim.nl
>     
This couldn't be a usb1 vs usb2 issues, could it?  Have you tried 
swapping the cables on the two usb printers to see what happens?  Or 
tried a different usb cable?

Kevin

[Kevin Martin]

Kevin Martin wrote:
>  Colin_Brace wrote:
> > Kevin Martin wrote:
> >   
> >> of course, I meant Canon, not Lexmark. 
> >> However, is the LexMark printer working correctly?
> >>
> >>     
> >
> > I realized that. ;)  Yes, the Z51 works fine.
> >
> > Nothing else to report from the kernel log; just hundreds of these:
> >
> > usblp1: error -32 reading printer status
> >
> > Google turns up only a very small number of hits for this, none of which
> > shed any light on the matter for me. 
> >
> > Any suggestions most welcome. 
> >
> > Thanks.
> >
> > -----
> >   Colin Brace
> >   Amsterdam
> >   http://lim.nl
> >   
>
>  This couldn't be a usb1 vs usb2 issues, could it?  Have you tried 
>  swapping the cables on the two usb printers to see what happens?  Or 
>  tried a different usb cable?
>
>  Kevin
>  
Also, look at this link:

http://lkml.org/lkml/2007/6/17/106

Maybe some information there that is pertinent.

Kevin

[Manuel Moreno]

I have an LBP5300 and works perfectly.

Just follow the installation instructions from the driver documentation.
Do not use any other installation method.

My advice is that you erase any trace of the failed installation and
strictly follow the installation manual.

BTW, you can get a more uptodate driver from.

http://support-asia.canon-asia.com/contents/ASIA/EN/0900772401.html

-- 
Manuel Moreno
manolo(a)miconexion.com

[Colin Brace]

Manuel Moreno wrote:
>  
>  I have an LBP5300 and works perfectly.
>  
>  Just follow the installation instructions from the driver documentation.
>  Do not use any other installation method.
>  
>  My advice is that you erase any trace of the failed installation and
>  strictly follow the installation manual.
>  
>  BTW, you can get a more uptodate driver from.
>  
>  http://support-asia.canon-asia.com/contents/ASIA/EN/0900772401.html
>   
Thanks, Manuel. I am downloading the more recent 1.7 version. Strange that
the latest version is 1.6 at Canon Europe site -- and 1.5 at Canon Japan!

I will review the documentation tomorrow. 

-----
  Colin Brace
  Amsterdam
  http://lim.nl
-- 
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/F9%3A-Canon-LBP2900-no-go%3A-%22usblp1%3A-error--32...
Sent from the Fedora List mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

[Colin Brace]

Kevin Martin wrote:
>  
> > This couldn't be a usb1 vs usb2 issues, could it?  Have you tried 
> > swapping the cables on the two usb printers to see what happens?  Or 
> > tried a different usb cable?
>   
Kevin, thanks for your suggestions. I tried a different USB cable. No
difference. I also tried disabling USB v2 by running "modprobe -r ehci_hcd"
in case the LBP2900 had some obscure USB v2 issue. Likewise no luck. I also
tried connecting the printer to a laptop running Ubuntu 8.04, with an older
kernel than F9, 2.6.24-19. Basically the same results.

Tomorrow I will try the v1.7 version driver from Canon Asia, and see if the
documentation has any pointers.

-----
  Colin Brace
  Amsterdam
  http://lim.nl
-- 
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/F9%3A-Canon-LBP2900-no-go%3A-%22usblp1%3A-error--32...
Sent from the Fedora List mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

[Colin Brace]

Manuel Moreno wrote:
>  
>  BTW, you can get a more uptodate driver from.
>  
>  http://support-asia.canon-asia.com/contents/ASIA/EN/0900772401.html
>   
Hi again,

v1.7 of the CAPT driver has a dependency unmet in F9:

$ sudo rpm -Uvh cndrvcups-capt-1.70-1.i386.rpm
cndrvcups-common-1.70-1.i386.rpm 
error: Failed dependencies:
	libstdc++.so.5 is needed by cndrvcups-capt-1.70-1.i386
	libstdc++.so.5(CXXABI_1.2) is needed by cndrvcups-capt-1.70-1.i386
	libstdc++.so.5(GLIBCPP_3.2) is needed by cndrvcups-capt-1.70-1.i386
	libstdc++.so.5(GLIBCPP_3.2.2) is needed by cndrvcups-capt-1.70-1.i386

I have libstdc installed, but apparently the wrong version:

$ rpm -qa  | grep libstdc
libstdc++-devel-4.3.0-8.i386
libstdc++-4.3.0-8.i386

What package did you install to get the v1.7 driver working under F9?

Thanks.

-----
  Colin Brace
  Amsterdam
  http://lim.nl
-- 
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/F9%3A-Canon-LBP2900-no-go%3A-%22usblp1%3A-error--32...
Sent from the Fedora List mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

[Chris Stark]

Colin_Brace wrote:
>  error: Failed dependencies:
>  	libstdc++.so.5 is needed by cndrvcups-capt-1.70-1.i386
>  	libstdc++.so.5(CXXABI_1.2) is needed by cndrvcups-capt-1.70-1.i386
>  	libstdc++.so.5(GLIBCPP_3.2) is needed by cndrvcups-capt-1.70-1.i386
>  	libstdc++.so.5(GLIBCPP_3.2.2) is needed by cndrvcups-capt-1.70-1.i386 
Try "compat-libstdc++-33"

[Manuel Moreno]

On Tue, 2008-06-10 at 14:29 -0700, Colin_Brace wrote:
>  libstdc++.so.5 
compat-libstdc++


-- 
Manuel Moreno
manolo(a)miconexion.com

[Manuel Moreno]

On Tue, 2008-06-10 at 14:29 -0700, Colin_Brace wrote:
>  
>  Manuel Moreno wrote:
>  > 
>  > BTW, you can get a more uptodate driver from.
>  > 
>  > http://support-asia.canon-asia.com/contents/ASIA/EN/0900772401.html
>  > 
>  
>  Hi again,
>  
>  v1.7 of the CAPT driver has a dependency unmet in F9:
>  
>  $ sudo rpm -Uvh cndrvcups-capt-1.70-1.i386.rpm
>  cndrvcups-common-1.70-1.i386.rpm  
better 

$ sudo yum localinstall cndrvcups-capt-1.70-1.i386.rpm
cndrvcups-common-1.70-1.i386.rpm

-- 
Manuel Moreno
manolo(a)miconexion.com

[Colin Brace]

Hi all,

Back in June, I bought a Canon LBP2900 laser printer, and tried to get it
working under Fedora. After a long break, I am back again where I left off.
I reinstalled the OS yesterday (F8, for complicted reasons) and I am again
trying to get this printer working.

As I mentioned in my original post, I downloaded the CAPT driver from Canon
Europe. Here are the RPMs I have installed:

2007-12-03 08:49 cndrvcups-capt-1.60-1.i386.rpm
2007-12-03 08:49 cndrvcups-common-1.60-1.i386.rpm

(the later v1.7 package referred to earlier by another lister is no longer
available)

Once installed, CAPS automatically recognizes the printer and selects 
what appears to be the correct driver: Canon LBP2900 CAPT ver.1.5

Likewise, the printer shows up properly in dmesg:

usb 1-7: new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 10
usb 1-7: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice
usblp1: USB Bidirectional printer dev 10 if 0 alt 0 proto 2 vid 0x04A9 pid
0x2676
usb 1-7: New USB device found, idVendor=04a9, idProduct=2676
usb 1-7: New USB device strings: Mfr=1, Product=2, SerialNumber=3
usb 1-7: Product: Canon CAPT USB Device
usb 1-7: Manufacturer: Canon
usb 1-7: SerialNumber: 0000A380HGkZ

but if I try a test page, nothing happens. The only indication that 
something is wrong is this error message repeatedly displayed in dmesg:

usblp1: error -32 reading printer status

Anyone have any ideas for me?

Thanks.



-----
  Colin Brace
  Amsterdam
  http://lim.nl
-- 
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/F9%3A-Canon-LBP2900-no-go%3A-%22usblp1%3A-error--32...
Sent from the Fedora List mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

[Bassel Safadi]

On Mon, Sep 1, 2008 at 1:10 PM, Colin Brace <cb(a)lim.nl&gt; wrote:

>  Hi all,
>
>  Back in June, I bought a Canon LBP2900 laser printer, and tried to get it
>  working under Fedora. After a long break, I am back again where I left off.
>  I reinstalled the OS yesterday (F8, for complicted reasons) and I am again
>  trying to get this printer working.
>
>  As I mentioned in my original post, I downloaded the CAPT driver from Canon
>  Europe. Here are the RPMs I have installed:
>
>  2007-12-03 08:49 cndrvcups-capt-1.60-1.i386.rpm
>  2007-12-03 08:49 cndrvcups-common-1.60-1.i386.rpm
>
>  (the later v1.7 package referred to earlier by another lister is no longer
>  available)
>
>  Once installed, CAPS automatically recognizes the printer and selects
>  what appears to be the correct driver: Canon LBP2900 CAPT ver.1.5
>
>  Likewise, the printer shows up properly in dmesg:
>
>  usb 1-7: new high speed USB device using ehci_hcd and address 10
>  usb 1-7: configuration #1 chosen from 1 choice
>  usblp1: USB Bidirectional printer dev 10 if 0 alt 0 proto 2 vid 0x04A9 pid
>  0x2676
>  usb 1-7: New USB device found, idVendor=04a9, idProduct=2676
>  usb 1-7: New USB device strings: Mfr=1, Product=2, SerialNumber=3
>  usb 1-7: Product: Canon CAPT USB Device
>  usb 1-7: Manufacturer: Canon
>  usb 1-7: SerialNumber: 0000A380HGkZ
>
>  but if I try a test page, nothing happens. The only indication that
>  something is wrong is this error message repeatedly displayed in dmesg:
>
>  usblp1: error -32 reading printer status
>
>  Anyone have any ideas for me?
>
>  Thanks.
>
>
>
>  -----
>   Colin Brace
>   Amsterdam
>   http://lim.nl
>  --
>  View this message in context:
>
> http://www.nabble.com/F9%3A-Canon-LBP2900-no-go%3A-%22usblp1%3A-error--32...
>  Sent from the Fedora List mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>  --
>  fedora-list mailing list
>  fedora-list(a)redhat.com
>  To unsubscribe: https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-list
>  Guidelines:
>  http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Communicate/MailingListGuidelines
>  

http://linux.derkeiler.com/Mailing-Lists/Fedora/2008-06/msg02415.html