oops, can i retract my tone, please?
a private news server is fine :)
--
Thufir Hawat
----- Original Message -----
From: "THUFIR HAWAT" <thufir.hawat(a)mail.com>
To: fedora-list(a)redhat.com
Subject: Re: Solution Coming Re: Fedora Community: Under threat?
Date: Sun, 06 Feb 2005 07:55:16 +0000
this is absolutely the crux of the issue; the quantity of this list
itself is spam.
you haven't established that enforcement of the "be nice" policy is
required, though. there're plenty of technical news groups which are
alive and well; their existence serves as a counter example that "be
nice" has to be enforcable.
ok, let's work from the premise that the "be nice" policy (good
choice of words) has to be enforcable. is enforcement compatible
with nntp, or, can it be made compatible? even if they're they're
incompatible, to not use nntp is to throw the baby out with the
bathwater.
what are the goals here? minimize spam, maximize community
involvement (quantity and quality of the material) *and* good
archiving, so that questions don't repeatedly come up.
--
Thufir Hawat
//////////////cut and paste from archive////////////////////
Re: Solution Coming Re: Fedora Community: Under threat?,
* From: Matthew Miller <mattdm mattdm org>
* To: For users of Fedora Core releases <fedora-list redhat com>
* Subject: Re: Solution Coming Re: Fedora Community: Under threat?,
* Date: Sat, 5 Feb 2005 18:49:04 -0500
[..]
In order to keep spam down, and to institute unique policies ("be nice",
say), it's probably best to have a private news server rather than public
newsgroups.
--
___________________________________________________________
Sign-up for Ads Free at
Mail.com
http://promo.mail.com/adsfreejump.htm
--
___________________________________________________________
Sign-up for Ads Free at
Mail.com
http://promo.mail.com/adsfreejump.htm