On http://getfedora.org/server we have a quotation that I think can be easily misunderstood. Dan Mossor kindly provided some input on how cool Cockpit and Rolekit are, and how these new toolsets make server management even easier. These features are not in CentOS or other OSes yet.
But the quotation can be interpreted to mean we are somehow competing with CentOS, or implying that it's deficient in some way. I don't think that's what was intended or a message we want to send. We are partners with CentOS in a larger ecosystem, after all, and both Fedora and CentOS have something to offer in the next-gen server management tool space.
I've reached out to Dan to see if we can get a restatement. Once we get that, we should push a revised POT, let L10n know about the change, and ask them for revision to the affected string.
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 09:54:45AM -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote:
On http://getfedora.org/server we have a quotation that I think can be easily misunderstood. Dan Mossor kindly provided some input on how cool Cockpit and Rolekit are, and how these new toolsets make server management even easier. These features are not in CentOS or other OSes yet.
But the quotation can be interpreted to mean we are somehow competing with CentOS, or implying that it's deficient in some way. I don't think that's what was intended or a message we want to send. We are partners with CentOS in a larger ecosystem, after all, and both Fedora and CentOS have something to offer in the next-gen server management tool space.
I've reached out to Dan to see if we can get a restatement. Once we get that, we should push a revised POT, let L10n know about the change, and ask them for revision to the affected string.
Dan said that we can s/CentOS/other operating systems/ for his testimonial. I'm going to commit the change now.
Robert, in the morning can you press POT and notify L10n about it? If not, just let me know and I'll try to do it around meetings in the morning in my TZ. Thanks! :-)
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 05:57:55PM -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 09:54:45AM -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote:
On http://getfedora.org/server we have a quotation that I think can be easily misunderstood. Dan Mossor kindly provided some input on how cool Cockpit and Rolekit are, and how these new toolsets make server management even easier. These features are not in CentOS or other OSes yet.
But the quotation can be interpreted to mean we are somehow competing with CentOS, or implying that it's deficient in some way. I don't think that's what was intended or a message we want to send. We are partners with CentOS in a larger ecosystem, after all, and both Fedora and CentOS have something to offer in the next-gen server management tool space.
I've reached out to Dan to see if we can get a restatement. Once we get that, we should push a revised POT, let L10n know about the change, and ask them for revision to the affected string.
Dan said that we can s/CentOS/other operating systems/ for his testimonial. I'm going to commit the change now.
Robert, in the morning can you press POT and notify L10n about it? If not, just let me know and I'll try to do it around meetings in the morning in my TZ. Thanks! :-)
Just a confession: I made a git goof, and I very quickly discovered and fixed it (forcibly), since it involved pushing a large binary unintentionally into the tree. No one probably saw this, since I fixed the error about 90 seconds after the first push. But I wanted to be honest with everyone just in case. :-)
2014-12-11 0:12 GMT+01:00 Paul W. Frields stickster@gmail.com:
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 05:57:55PM -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote:
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 09:54:45AM -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote:
On http://getfedora.org/server we have a quotation that I think can be easily misunderstood. Dan Mossor kindly provided some input on how cool Cockpit and Rolekit are, and how these new toolsets make server management even easier. These features are not in CentOS or other OSes yet.
But the quotation can be interpreted to mean we are somehow competing with CentOS, or implying that it's deficient in some way. I don't think that's what was intended or a message we want to send. We are partners with CentOS in a larger ecosystem, after all, and both Fedora and CentOS have something to offer in the next-gen server management tool space.
I've reached out to Dan to see if we can get a restatement. Once we get that, we should push a revised POT, let L10n know about the change, and ask them for revision to the affected string.
Dan said that we can s/CentOS/other operating systems/ for his testimonial. I'm going to commit the change now.
Robert, in the morning can you press POT and notify L10n about it? If not, just let me know and I'll try to do it around meetings in the morning in my TZ. Thanks! :-)
Just a confession: I made a git goof, and I very quickly discovered and fixed it (forcibly), since it involved pushing a large binary unintentionally into the tree. No one probably saw this, since I fixed the error about 90 seconds after the first push. But I wanted to be honest with everyone just in case. :-)
-- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ The open source story continues to grow: http://opensource.com -- websites mailing list websites@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/websites
Oh, thanks for this, didn't noticed it before. We are on master, should be all fixed now and live with the next build. Good night.
2014-12-10 23:57 GMT+01:00 Paul W. Frields stickster@gmail.com:
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 09:54:45AM -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote:
On http://getfedora.org/server we have a quotation that I think can be easily misunderstood. Dan Mossor kindly provided some input on how cool Cockpit and Rolekit are, and how these new toolsets make server management even easier. These features are not in CentOS or other OSes yet.
But the quotation can be interpreted to mean we are somehow competing with CentOS, or implying that it's deficient in some way. I don't think that's what was intended or a message we want to send. We are partners with CentOS in a larger ecosystem, after all, and both Fedora and CentOS have something to offer in the next-gen server management tool space.
I've reached out to Dan to see if we can get a restatement. Once we get that, we should push a revised POT, let L10n know about the change, and ask them for revision to the affected string.
Dan said that we can s/CentOS/other operating systems/ for his testimonial. I'm going to commit the change now.
Robert, in the morning can you press POT and notify L10n about it? If not, just let me know and I'll try to do it around meetings in the morning in my TZ. Thanks! :-)
-- Paul W. Frields http://paul.frields.org/ gpg fingerprint: 3DA6 A0AC 6D58 FEC4 0233 5906 ACDB C937 BD11 3717 http://redhat.com/ - - - - http://pfrields.fedorapeople.org/ The open source story continues to grow: http://opensource.com -- websites mailing list websites@lists.fedoraproject.org https://admin.fedoraproject.org/mailman/listinfo/websites
Done. Will notify them tomorrow, but most of them get notified via TX. Cheers.
On Thu, Dec 11, 2014 at 12:12:29AM +0100, Robert Mayr wrote:
2014-12-10 23:57 GMT+01:00 Paul W. Frields stickster@gmail.com:
On Wed, Dec 10, 2014 at 09:54:45AM -0500, Paul W. Frields wrote:
On http://getfedora.org/server we have a quotation that I think can be easily misunderstood. Dan Mossor kindly provided some input on how cool Cockpit and Rolekit are, and how these new toolsets make server management even easier. These features are not in CentOS or other OSes yet.
But the quotation can be interpreted to mean we are somehow competing with CentOS, or implying that it's deficient in some way. I don't think that's what was intended or a message we want to send. We are partners with CentOS in a larger ecosystem, after all, and both Fedora and CentOS have something to offer in the next-gen server management tool space.
I've reached out to Dan to see if we can get a restatement. Once we get that, we should push a revised POT, let L10n know about the change, and ask them for revision to the affected string.
Dan said that we can s/CentOS/other operating systems/ for his testimonial. I'm going to commit the change now.
Robert, in the morning can you press POT and notify L10n about it? If not, just let me know and I'll try to do it around meetings in the morning in my TZ. Thanks! :-)
Done. Will notify them tomorrow, but most of them get notified via TX. Cheers.
Thanks Robert!
websites@lists.fedoraproject.org
-
Paul W. Frields -
Robert Mayr