#293: Some websites still use fedoraproject.org files
-----------------------+-----------------------
Reporter: robyduck | Owner: webmaster
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: General | Keywords:
Blocked By: | Blocking:
-----------------------+-----------------------
Our storical website http://fedoraproject.org actually has been replaced
by https://getfedora.org and is now outdated. We still keep fp.o live
although it's not build anymore, because many websites (also some apps
probably) and the wiki still use CSS classes or other files which are in
the fp.o tree.
We should make sure all webpages have these files locally because fp.o
will be overwritten at some point.
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-websites/ticket/293>
fedora-websites <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Websites>
Fedora Website Team's Trac instance
#274: UEFI consistency warning
--------------------------+-----------------------
Reporter: immanetize | Owner: webmaster
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: critical | Milestone: Fedora 21
Component: get.fp.o | Keywords:
Blocked By: | Blocking:
--------------------------+-----------------------
Please add a prominent warning advising users to be consistent in their
usage of UEFI or CSM (BIOS) style installation when booting multiple
operating systems. Whether by misconception, firmware quirks, poor media
creation tools, or accident, users have been consistently reporting issues
with booting their Windows installations after installing Fedora. I have
observed that a significant number of these issues relate to the user
"disabling UEFI" to install Fedora, then discovering that their UEFI
installation of Windows no longer boots. Browse through
ask.fedoraproject.org for Windows related questions, and you'll see how
prevalent these issues are.
There is documentation under development to further explain the issues
involved, but it would be hugely beneficial to have a simple warning to be
consistent displayed when the Fedora image is downloaded. Maybe in
download-splash?
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-websites/ticket/274>
fedora-websites <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Websites>
Fedora Website Team's Trac instance
#91: fedorahosted could use a redesign
---------------------+------------------------
Reporter: toshio | Owner: webmaster
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: General | Version:
Keywords: | Blocked By:
Blocking: |
---------------------+------------------------
Some things I noticed while walking some non-Fedora people through getting
connected on fedorahosted:
* need to point people from fedorahosted to
admin.fedoraproject.org/accounts/ for signing up for a new account
* Not obvious to people that they don't need to sign the FPCA to
contribute on hosted (although that's a project-by-projcet setting)
* http://fedorahosted.org/ should give an overview of what fedorahosted is
rather than a list of projects so that people can find out that anyone can
put upstream code there.
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-websites/ticket/91>
fedora-websites <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Websites>
Fedora Website Team's Trac instance
#244: Create system for automated screenshots capture
--------------------------+-----------------------
Reporter: jreznik | Owner: webmaster
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: minor | Milestone:
Component: General | Keywords:
Blocked By: | Blocking:
--------------------------+-----------------------
For releases, screenshot creation depends mostly on volunteers with the
need to cover many different options. As screenshots for spins, local
Fedora webs looking for translated screenshots etc. It would be nice to
have (semi)-automated system for screenshots capture.
Requirements - be able to take screenshot from all offered options we
ship, in defined language (optionally for all language variants we offer
for websites).
Implementation could be done through utilization of libvirt and dogtails
scripts. I can even imagine generic Fedora screenshots capture system
based on this effort for App Stream data screenshots creation even with
some sort of joined effort with QA validation for Applications test case
criteria (but this is now pretty much out of scope of initial project).
But I can check with those parties too.
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-websites/ticket/244>
fedora-websites <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Websites>
Fedora Website Team's Trac instance
#209: use geolocation to pick default ec2 region on getfedora page
--------------------------+-----------------------
Reporter: mattdm | Owner: webmaster
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 20
Component: General | Keywords:
Blocked By: | Blocking:
--------------------------+-----------------------
With F19, the "launch" page doesn't show up until you choose a region. We
could default to us-east-1, because that's the biggest and most-full
featured region, but that may come off as a little us-centric. So, what
about guessing the closest region based on geoip, for the F20 version of
the page?
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-websites/ticket/209>
fedora-websites <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Websites>
Fedora Website Team's Trac instance
#193: fudcon websites is badly designed
---------------------+------------------------
Reporter: shaiton | Owner: webmaster
Type: defect | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: General | Version:
Keywords: | Blocked By:
Blocking: |
---------------------+------------------------
This websites use the Genshi framework to build without using the Genshi
templates.
Once we decide what to do with this website (continue, recode, or drop) we
will need to clean it.
- Making use of data/templates (they are currently not used at all) and
removing specific headers in data/content/*
- probably share the templates with the other websites.
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-websites/ticket/193>
fedora-websites <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Websites>
Fedora Website Team's Trac instance
#269: redirect all sites to https
--------------------------+-----------------------
Reporter: mattdm | Owner: webmaster
Type: enhancement | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone:
Component: General | Keywords:
Blocked By: | Blocking:
--------------------------+-----------------------
See http://googleonlinesecurity.blogspot.cz/2014/08/https-as-ranking-
signal_6.html
In addition to being good for our users and an improvement in security,
this will increase our google search ranking.
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-websites/ticket/269>
fedora-websites <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Websites>
Fedora Website Team's Trac instance
#315: New website for Spins-ARM-Docker
-------------------------+-----------------------
Reporter: robyduck | Owner: webmaster
Type: task | Status: new
Priority: major | Milestone: Fedora 22
Component: spins.fp.o | Keywords:
Blocked By: | Blocking:
-------------------------+-----------------------
After getfedora.org and focusing mostly on the three editions of
fedora.next it's time to make another step forward and give Spins, ARM and
Docker a nice place where to live. Actually all images, prerelease and
other informations are on https://spins.fedoraproject.org but it's really
confusing because this website was not build to host more and different
images than spins.
I've just created the spins-redesign branch and my thought is to write a
bootstrap and mobile friendly website where all images should have their
own space. Further, this website needs to be different from getfedora.org,
but this doesn't mean it should be aweful ;)
We still need to decide the subdomain for this page, as spins.fpo doesn't
fit the content anymore. This can be changed also later, in the meanwhile
I'll call it labs.fedoraproject.org.
Other thoughts:
* Header and footer could be almost the same as on getfedora.org
* ULS will be the same as getfedora.org
* One landing page where people can have an overview of what this website
provides
* Spins will lead to a page, similar to what we have now on spins.fpo,
where we could separate Desktop Spins from other Spins
* Ever single Spin should have it's own Download/feature/screenshots page,
a sort of dedicated spins page where people can get all they are looking
for
* ARM can go directly to the download page, as there is not much to say
(unless ARM folks want to have this in a different way)
* Docker will have just one download page
We need to work together with all Spins SIGs and need new screenshots and
features for every single spin. We can probably reuse the images we have
already on spins.fpo, but for other icons or banners we need new design.
Same for ARM, we need their opinion and must understand what ARM folks
need on the pages, same as for Docker (Cloud).
It's a huge task and have this website running fine for F22 GA is a great
challenge, so I hope we can all work on it together to split the workload
and go on faster :)
--
Ticket URL: <https://fedorahosted.org/fedora-websites/ticket/315>
fedora-websites <https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Websites>
Fedora Website Team's Trac instance