-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1
Rahul Sundaram schreef:
Bart Couvreur wrote:
Why link? Shouldn't we just add them to the site? As in keeping the people on our site, not Red Hat's, which makes the line between Red Hat and Fedora somewhat less obscure, imho.
Red Hat handles press releases for Fedora which has a budget around that and won't spread much without the contacts already well established. Leverage it is IMO better.
Understood
On a totally unrelated note, should we get our heads round L10N? Or not?
As in having a static version of L10N page or have L10N versions of this pages? I would rather not do the former and the latter should definitely be done. One more reason to get the website launched early.
The latter was indeed what I meant. Apache has some nice things to do an automated check off the language a give the right one (based on browser-settings). Or should we use a javascript-detection and/or linking to the seperate lang-pages?.
I suppose Apache would be the way to go.
On an L10N-infrastructural note, we should look at the way the homepage-module in the docs-project works, to make sure we can let the translators work with their favorite translation-tools. An xml/xsl combination seems to do the trick.
Can we get these pages into CVS or something?
- -- Bart couf@fedoraproject.org couf@skynet.be key fingerprint: 6AAB 544D 3432 D013 776D 3602 ADB6 6B2A D93F 0F93